2017
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The heterogeneous impact of a successful tobacco control campaign: a case study of Mauritius

Abstract: These results suggest that tobacco control policies, including sizeable tax increases, were progressive in their impact. We conclude that tobacco use increases poverty and inequality, but stronger tobacco control policies can mitigate the impact of tobacco use on impoverishment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Country heterogeneity in results might be explained by differences in tobacco control regimes across countries. In Mauritius, for example, expenditure allocations were different before and after the imposition of a series of tobacco control measures in the period 2009 to 2012 [11]. In Turkey, on the other hand, there was little evidence that tobacco control policies mattered for expenditure allocations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Country heterogeneity in results might be explained by differences in tobacco control regimes across countries. In Mauritius, for example, expenditure allocations were different before and after the imposition of a series of tobacco control measures in the period 2009 to 2012 [11]. In Turkey, on the other hand, there was little evidence that tobacco control policies mattered for expenditure allocations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous literature focuses on the effect of tobacco consumption on household expenditure and, therefore, the original conditional demand model is often simplified to include a binary indicator of tobacco expenditure and an interaction term with net household expenditure [7, 8, 11]. In this paper, rather than assuming that the adult sex ratio (or any other instrument) is imperfect, we assume that it is one of a number of factors (like education and income, among others) that underscores household tobacco consumption decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first studies in the early 2000s,1 2 research especially from low and middle-income countries (LMIC) analysed the crowding out effect of spending on tobacco and consistently found evidence that this effect negatively affected spending on mainly basic necessities 3–22…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical evidence from the LMICs shows that the poor households are the most affected 5 6 8 9 14 15. For example, in rural Indonesia,8 households with at least one smoker tend to divert a significant amount of their already scarce budget to tobacco products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is against this backdrop that this article seeks to explain how tobacco control rose to prominence in the government policy agenda. The existing literature either evaluates the efficacy of a specific tobacco control instrument or examines the negative health effects of smoking on the Mauritian people (see Azagba et al 2015;Cox et al 2000;López et al 2011;Ross et al 2018;Sun, Erriah, and Ramasawmy 2014;Tumwine 2011). Burhoo, Mohee, and Moussa (2011) have attempted a political economic explanation of Mauritius's tobacco control policies; however, their explanation was conducted with no theoretical discussion of the policy-making process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%