2018
DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Heterogeneous Responses of Consumption between Poor and Rich to Government Spending Shocks

Abstract: Government spending shocks have substantially different effects on consumers across the income distribution: consumption increases for the poor whereas it decreases for the rich in response to a rise in government expenditure. I shed light on this issue by incorporating a progressive tax scheme and productive public expenditure into a heterogeneous agent model economy with indivisible labor. The model economy is able to successfully match aggregate and disaggregate effects of government spending shocks on cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(161 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication is that spending shocks may temporarily reduce the consumption inequality associated with job loss. Related findings on the distributional effects of government spending can be found inGalí et al (2007),Anderson, Inoue, and Rossi (2016), andMa (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The implication is that spending shocks may temporarily reduce the consumption inequality associated with job loss. Related findings on the distributional effects of government spending can be found inGalí et al (2007),Anderson, Inoue, and Rossi (2016), andMa (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The implication is that spending shocks may temporarily reduce the consumption inequality associated with job loss. Related findings on the distributional effects of government spending can be found inGalí et al (2007),Anderson, Inoue, andRossi (2016), andMa (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“… 29 Complementing the evidence on the positive labor share response to government spending shocks in Fig. 4 , Ma (2019) documents heterogeneity in the consumption responses of poor and rich households. …”
mentioning
confidence: 78%