2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06364.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hidden cost of neuraxial anaesthesia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A closed-claim analysis of medicolegal cases related to regional anaesthesia in the United Kingdom showed that the costs of claims associated with epidural techniques were far higher than those associated with peripheral nerve blocks. 48 A survey of Australian anaesthesiologists showed that 82% had changed their practice in recent years in that they performed fewer epidural anaesthetics. The 2 most common reasons were fear of litigation and a lack of evidence for beneficial effects.…”
Section: Risks Of Epidural Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closed-claim analysis of medicolegal cases related to regional anaesthesia in the United Kingdom showed that the costs of claims associated with epidural techniques were far higher than those associated with peripheral nerve blocks. 48 A survey of Australian anaesthesiologists showed that 82% had changed their practice in recent years in that they performed fewer epidural anaesthetics. The 2 most common reasons were fear of litigation and a lack of evidence for beneficial effects.…”
Section: Risks Of Epidural Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant risks related to epidural analgesia are dural puncture, epidural haematoma, abscess, and spinal cord injury [28, 40]. A close‐claim analysis of medicolegal cases related to regional anaesthesia in the UK showed that the claim costs associated with epidural analgesia are far higher than those associated with peripheral analgesia [2], making it less attractive for general use [36]. Furthermore, although no serious complications occurred in the FCCEB group because we used fluoroscopic guidance, UCISB is thought to be safer and more effective than FCCEB for analgesia following ARCR because of lower risk of complications and greater analgesic potency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obstetric anesthesia is a high risk specialty [12][13][14][15]. It is not necessary to be negligent during a procedure such as spinal anesthesia for damage to occur [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%