2015
DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hidden Costs of Downsizing

Abstract: We analyse whether a principal's decision to lay off an agent affects the performance of the surviving agents in a laboratory experiment. We find that agents reduce their performance by 43% as a response to the lay-off decision. Heterogeneity in principals' decisions can largely be explained by different beliefs about how agents react to lay-offs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the layoff occurs exogenously, the effect on the motivation of the workers vanishes. Our results are in line with Drzensky and Heinz (2014) as a business downturn is most likely to be perceived as an exogenous factor leading to downsizing. Layoffs to improve efficiency may not be understood and supported by the employees and could, at least in the short run, destroy workforce morale and undermine firm productivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the layoff occurs exogenously, the effect on the motivation of the workers vanishes. Our results are in line with Drzensky and Heinz (2014) as a business downturn is most likely to be perceived as an exogenous factor leading to downsizing. Layoffs to improve efficiency may not be understood and supported by the employees and could, at least in the short run, destroy workforce morale and undermine firm productivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(Baumol, Blinder and Wolff, 2003;De Meuse and Marks, 2003;Dong and Xu, 2008). Drzensky and Heinz (2014) find proof for this so-called "survivor syndrome" using a laboratory experiment. Interestingly, survivors reduce their performance considerably after the decision to lay off a worker only if it concerns a voluntary decision of the principal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slider task is now well established as a tool for experimental economists. Since its inception, the slider task has been used to study contract law (Depoorter and Tontrup, 2012), tax compliance (Fonseca and Myles, 2012;Doerrenberg et al, 2015), cheating in the workplace (Gill et al, 2013), gender differences in competition (Gill and Prowse, 2014), tax complexity (Abeler and Jäger, 2015), outside options (Goerg et al, 2017), downsizing (Drzensky and Heinz, 2016), social enterprises (Besley and Ghatak, 2017), volunteering (Brown et al, 2013), peer pressure (Georganas et al, 2015), social insurance (Ahlquist et al, 2014), delegation (Feess et al, 2014) and creativity (Bradler et al, 2015), among others. 2 This paper describes the properties and advantages of the slider task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shepherd (2017) noted that employees' zeal to complete tasks is shattered when they experience the loss of co-workers through labour force reduction especially when the memories are fresh on their mind. Drensky and Heinz (2014) emphasized that labour force reduction on its own is not sufficient to hinder employees from tackling the tasks they used to tackle before labour force reduction. Ko and Yeh (2013) also added that labour force reduction initiatives cannot scare an employee into taking on new responsibilities in the workplace.…”
Section: Production Timementioning
confidence: 99%