2003
DOI: 10.1086/376391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The High‐Resolution Light‐polluted Night‐Sky Spectrum at Mount Hamilton, California

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Sky spectra were recorded over San Jose at the Lick Observatory over the 3800-9200 Å spectral range, with a spectral resolution of 45,000. Strong atomic lines were detected from Al i, Ar i, Hg i, K i, Li i, Na i, Ne i, Sc i, Sc ii, Th i, Th ii, and from O i and OH nightglow features. Spectra are contrasted for observations over San Jose (west), the zenith direction, and the eastern sky. When observing in the easterly direction, the emission intensity is still 20%-30% of that seen toward the west. For… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twilight emission of this line was also detected from Calcutta observatory by Bhaumik et al [10]. Strong atomic line of Li was observed by Slanger et al [11] at San Jose from the Lick observatory. The proposed excitation mechanism [12] of lithium airglow line indicates that the intensity of Li 6708 Å line is affected by the variation of ozone concentration.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Twilight emission of this line was also detected from Calcutta observatory by Bhaumik et al [10]. Strong atomic line of Li was observed by Slanger et al [11] at San Jose from the Lick observatory. The proposed excitation mechanism [12] of lithium airglow line indicates that the intensity of Li 6708 Å line is affected by the variation of ozone concentration.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…On the other hand, the range of SQM-LE readings checked in our setup at ∼ 16 to 18 mag arcsec −2 would be closer to the actual NSB observed than the range studied by the calibration setups of the manufacturer and in Cinzano (2013b). Moreover, the spectral characteristic of our light source was very different from that of the typical light-polluted night skies (Sheen & Byun 2004;Slanger et al 2003;Della Prugna 1999;Lane & Garrison 1978). Nevertheless, performance of all optical components and SQL-LE units used in our study were monitored under the current design since the start of the project.…”
Section: Data Quality and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This was further checked by measuring the position of three sky lines per grism and comparing them with values in the literature (Slanger et al 2003). The error was confirmed to be 0.5 Å.…”
Section: Wavelength Errorsmentioning
confidence: 89%