1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00461150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The HIPERLAN equalizer ASIC complexity and its relationship with the training header

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• A real multiply is assumed to be approximately eight times more complex than a real add [27]. • Shift operations are excluded from the calculations.…”
Section: E System Level Comparison Of the Two Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A real multiply is assumed to be approximately eight times more complex than a real add [27]. • Shift operations are excluded from the calculations.…”
Section: E System Level Comparison Of the Two Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the system must be designed to converge automati cally to a set of coefficient values which allow for relatively error free data reception. To accomplish this, many systems use what is called a training sequence [3], [14], [21], [22].…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the use of a training sequence requires the storage (or generation) of the sequence in both the transmitter and receiver [21]. This has two major consequences, the first is the obvious increase in size of the transceiver archi tectures and more importantly cost [22]. The second is the fact that both the transmitter and receiver must share this common sequence exactly.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%