2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-020-01117-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hispanic/Latinx Perinatal Paradox in the United States: A Scoping Review and Recommendations to Guide Future Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, due to variability in use of labels and operationalizations of terms which can cause confusion in the literature, clear definitions used by the researchers should always be included and explained within the manuscript (e.g., “Although these terms are not interchangeable, we will use “Hispanic” as a shortened version of Hispanic/Latinx to indicate a population of people who are either from or descended from Spanish and Portuguese speaking Latin American countries. For more details, please see our methods section”; ( Montoya-Williams et al, 2021 ), p. 2). This can be challenging as such decisions often involve a balance of highlighting terms preferred by the study population (e.g., only 3% of Hispanics use the term ‘Latinx’), maintaining fidelity to the terms the participants were originally presented with while participating in the study, and using inclusive, current language (e.g., gender-inclusive terms such as ‘Latinx’ or ‘Latine’; Pew Research Center, 2020b ).…”
Section: Justice Equity Diversity and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, due to variability in use of labels and operationalizations of terms which can cause confusion in the literature, clear definitions used by the researchers should always be included and explained within the manuscript (e.g., “Although these terms are not interchangeable, we will use “Hispanic” as a shortened version of Hispanic/Latinx to indicate a population of people who are either from or descended from Spanish and Portuguese speaking Latin American countries. For more details, please see our methods section”; ( Montoya-Williams et al, 2021 ), p. 2). This can be challenging as such decisions often involve a balance of highlighting terms preferred by the study population (e.g., only 3% of Hispanics use the term ‘Latinx’), maintaining fidelity to the terms the participants were originally presented with while participating in the study, and using inclusive, current language (e.g., gender-inclusive terms such as ‘Latinx’ or ‘Latine’; Pew Research Center, 2020b ).…”
Section: Justice Equity Diversity and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from this study may therefore be considered in the creation of targeted interventions to improve birth outcomes among expectant Latina mothers in general, and specifically among those from Mexico and Central America. Indeed, as Latina women are distinct patients who experience different protective and risk factors to their health and the health of their children due to differences in their family’s country or origin and whether they identify as immigrants [ 55 ], it is critical that health care providers establish a greater understanding of the varying health needs within the often-aggregated group of Latina women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, if confirmed in additional data, these results would have implications for the potential of minimum wage policies to address maternal health inequities. Overall, Hispanic women have similar rates of adverse birth and pregnancy outcomes as White women; however, rates are highly heterogenous with regard to nativity and country of origin, so a higher minimum wage may reduce health inequities within Hispanic subgroups . Emerging research shows that American Indian or Alaska Native and Black women experience chronic racism-related stress in conjunction with poverty-related stress, which is associated with higher levels of SLEs regardless of income .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%