2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Hispanic mortality paradox” revisited: Meta-analysis and meta-regression of life-course differentials in Latin American and Caribbean immigrants' mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the pooled analysis, crude relative risks (RR) were computed from available data for each study and pooled using a random effect model. Then, published adjusted odds or hazard ratio (HR) were harmonized into RR (30,31). A random effect model was used for pooling RR across studies, using the inverse variance weighting method.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the pooled analysis, crude relative risks (RR) were computed from available data for each study and pooled using a random effect model. Then, published adjusted odds or hazard ratio (HR) were harmonized into RR (30,31). A random effect model was used for pooling RR across studies, using the inverse variance weighting method.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hispanic paradox has been heavily criticized since it entirely discounts the health outcomes where Hispanics perform worse than Whites (eg hypertension and diabetes) 9 while also disregarding the within-group heterogeneity masked by the label of Hispanic ethnicity, failing to discern any differences between Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Central Americans, and Cubans. [10][11][12] The Hispanic paradox remains a problematic term since it misrepresents Hispanics as a comparatively healthy group when it is only a paradox because Whites are not outperforming Hispanics on all measures of health. The term positions Whites as the gold standard in the measuring and reporting of health outcomes.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gallet and Doucouliagos (2017) applied meta-regression analysis (MRA), and examine the healthcare spending elasticity for the mortality rate and the spending elasticity for life expectancy. Shor et al (2017)conducted meta-analyses and meta-regressions to examine the relationship between immigration and mortality from Latin American countries to OECD countries, and the overall results suggested no immigrant mortality advantage, and the relative risk of mortality largely depends on life course stages. Broadly speaking, a meta-analysis can be defined as a systematic literature review supported by statistical methods where the goal is to aggregate and contrast the findings from several related studies (Glass 1976).…”
Section: Why Meta-analysis Is Used To Re-examine the Impact Of Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%