2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The histologic and molecular correlates of COVID-19 vaccine-induced changes in the skin

Abstract: Twenty two patients who had developed an adverse cutaneous reaction to the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine underwent biopsies. Each case was assessed light microscopically and in select biopsies spike glycoprotein and cytokine assessment were also conducted. The patients developed self-limited cutaneous reactions often described clinically as urticarial or eczematous within one day to 4 weeks after receiving the first or second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine. Classic clinical and morphologic depictions of typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a possibility that the patient's cutaneous symptoms may be fully due to COVID-19 vaccination, while there is another possibility that the first symptoms that were caused by COVID-19 vaccination may have been worsened and prolonged by repetitive scratching. Magro et al described the histopathological findings of COVID-19-vaccine-induced changes in the skin 3. They reported that the most common pattern was eczematous dermatitis and/or concomitant cytotoxic interface dermatitis, which was also observed in our case.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…There is a possibility that the patient's cutaneous symptoms may be fully due to COVID-19 vaccination, while there is another possibility that the first symptoms that were caused by COVID-19 vaccination may have been worsened and prolonged by repetitive scratching. Magro et al described the histopathological findings of COVID-19-vaccine-induced changes in the skin 3. They reported that the most common pattern was eczematous dermatitis and/or concomitant cytotoxic interface dermatitis, which was also observed in our case.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Magro et al studied the biopsies of 22 patients who developed adverse skin changes after receiving mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines [3]. They reported interface dermatitis, eczematous dermatitis, lymphocytic vasculitis, Grover's disease, urticarial vasculitis, urticaria, perniosis, and granulomatous inflammation, with one case exhibiting an interstitial pattern and another exhibiting a folliculocentric neutrophilic and granulomatous reminiscent of vesiculopustular pyoderma gangrenosum [3]. Most of the cases reported in the same study demonstrated type IV hypersensitivity reaction and less commonly that of immune-complex-mediated hypersensitivity [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported interface dermatitis, eczematous dermatitis, lymphocytic vasculitis, Grover's disease, urticarial vasculitis, urticaria, perniosis, and granulomatous inflammation, with one case exhibiting an interstitial pattern and another exhibiting a folliculocentric neutrophilic and granulomatous reminiscent of vesiculopustular pyoderma gangrenosum [3]. Most of the cases reported in the same study demonstrated type IV hypersensitivity reaction and less commonly that of immune-complex-mediated hypersensitivity [3]. Moreover, Ramessur et al reported a 73-year-old man who developed cutaneous thrombosis associated with skin necrosis following the first dose of the vector-based ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cases of post-vaccination injection abscesses have been reported due to Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterial species following the use of Infanrix-Hexa ® (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Hib, Hep B) and Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccines [2] , [3] . COVID-19 vaccine has been reported to induce pyoderma gangrenosum, cellulitis, myositis, and subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis probably due to a complex interplay of neutrophilic activation and subsequent infiltration triggered by the viral antigens as well as type IV or immune-complex-mediated hypersensitivity reactions [4] , [5] . Hence, subtle alterations in immune responses following the vaccination leading to re-activation of B. pseudomallei infection in our patient is a likely possibility.…”
Section: Case Illustratedmentioning
confidence: 99%