2012
DOI: 10.4132/koreanjpathol.2012.46.4.349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Histologic Cut-off Point for Adjacent and Remote Non-neoplastic Liver Parenchyma of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Abstract: BackgroundThe molecular profile of peritumoral non-neoplastic liver parenchyma (PNLP) has recently been suggested as predictive factor of early and late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is no definite cut-off point for tumor-free PNLP in terms of either histological or molecular changes. Therefore, our aim is to determine the numerical cut-off point for separating adjacent PNLP and remote PNLP in histopathologic perspective.MethodsPeritumoral tissues from 20 resected HCC patients we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, and most importantly, the severity of fibrosis in the nonneoplastic liver within the surgical resection specimen cannot represent that of the remnant liver, which is more relevant to the risk of recurrence. Liver fibrosis and necroinflammation are more severe at the periphery of HCC ; therefore, extrapolation from the surgical specimen can overestimate the severity of fibrosis in the remnant liver and lead to sampling error. These findings suggest that noninvasive fibrosis indices may reflect the severity of liver fibrosis of the remnant liver better than the surgical resection specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, and most importantly, the severity of fibrosis in the nonneoplastic liver within the surgical resection specimen cannot represent that of the remnant liver, which is more relevant to the risk of recurrence. Liver fibrosis and necroinflammation are more severe at the periphery of HCC ; therefore, extrapolation from the surgical specimen can overestimate the severity of fibrosis in the remnant liver and lead to sampling error. These findings suggest that noninvasive fibrosis indices may reflect the severity of liver fibrosis of the remnant liver better than the surgical resection specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The METAVIR scoring system was used to determine fibrosis as follows: (0) normal liver; (1) expansion into some portal areas; (2) incomplete expansion with only one septa; (3) incomplete cirrhosis with several well-formed but thin septa; and (4) complete cirrhosis with thick septa and ductular reaction [19]. All other features of cholestasis were evaluated as follows: Inflammatory cell infiltration: (0) lack of inflammation; (1) presence of local inflammatory cells in less than 25% of hepatic tissue; (2) presence of local inflammatory cells in 25-50% of hepatic tissue; (3) local, but extensive, presence of inflammatory cells in 51-75% of hepatic tissue; (4) global inflammatory cell infiltration in hepatic tissue [20].…”
Section: Histopathological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonneoplastic liver within the surgical resection specimen cannot represent that of the remnant liver. Hence, the fibrosis-4 index, rather than cirrhosis, is potentially more able to accurately represent the underlying liver damage [ 6 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%