CrimRxiv 2022
DOI: 10.21428/cb6ab371.207de34e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The historicist objection to historical criminology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking historical difference seriously means recognising that one cannot simply translate policies or practices from other times to present contexts. History does not repeat itself exactly (see also Catello 2021). Still, meaningful comparisons across time can sometimes help inform thinking about present issues and policy reform (Thane 2009).…”
Section: The Reforming Impulsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking historical difference seriously means recognising that one cannot simply translate policies or practices from other times to present contexts. History does not repeat itself exactly (see also Catello 2021). Still, meaningful comparisons across time can sometimes help inform thinking about present issues and policy reform (Thane 2009).…”
Section: The Reforming Impulsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enlarging upon this genealogical inheritance, Roberto Catello has argued at length that historical criminology as such should be understood somewhat similarlyas a field of enquiry that mobilises historical materials to address questions concerning contemporary crime and justice (Catello , 2021. He sees historical criminology as a domain of practical enquiry, interrogating what ought to be done about criminal justice in the present and future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation