To see the future, we must look at the past (German proverb). A QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) is a mathematical equation that relates a property of interest such as a biological potency with one or more molecular properties (called descriptors), for a series of (usually) related compounds. A good example is the correlation of the anti-inflammatory potency of a series of ringsubstituted aspirin derivatives in the rat: In equation 1, ED50 = dose required to reduce paw inflammation by 50%, P = octanol-water partition coefficient, n = number of compounds used to develop the QSAR, r 2 =coefficient of determination, and s = standard error of the model. The statistics are very good, for r 2 = 0.904 means that the QSAR model accounts for 90.4% of the variation of anti-inflammatory potency. The use of log P as sole descriptor suggests that penetration of each compound to the site of action is the controlling factor. I wonder how many hundreds of aspirin derivatives were made and tested in years gone by in the hope of finding "a better aspirin", when the above model indicates that the best possible potency (assuming the same mode of action) would be only about 1.75 times that of aspirin. In line with the sentiment expressed in the German proverb that heads this Editorial, I have recently published two papers dealing with the history of QSAR.2,3 I was amazed to discover how much early work had been done. The earliest quantitative property prediction that I could find is that of Döbereiner, who in 1816 accurately predicted the specific weight of strontium sulphate by interpolation (read-across, in modern parlance) from those of calcium and barium sulphates. Even more amazing, in a way, is the insight shown by the Roman poet and philosopher Titus Lucretius Carus (ca. 99-55 B.C.), who in his De Rerum Natura 5 wrote: We see how quickly through a colander The wines will flow; how, on the other hand,