2016
DOI: 10.1080/0954898x.2016.1223365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The history and future of neural modeling for cochlear implants

Abstract: This special issue of Network: Computation in Neural Systems on the topic of "Computational models of the electrically stimulated auditory system" incorporates review articles spanning a wide range of approaches to modeling cochlear implant stimulation of the auditory system. The purpose of this overview paper is to provide a historical context for the different modeling endeavors and to point toward how computational modeling could play a key role in the understanding, evaluation, and improvement of cochlear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not presently known the extent that modeling traveling wave mechanics is important for conveying temporal fine structure cues (Loeb et al, 1983;Loeb, 2005;McGinley et al, 2012). Computational modeling can be used to clarify the tradeoffs between emulating traveling wave mechanics and minimizing the smearing of temporal cues for pitch perception (Cohen, 2009;Karg et al, 2013;Seeber and Bruce, 2016;van Gendt et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not presently known the extent that modeling traveling wave mechanics is important for conveying temporal fine structure cues (Loeb et al, 1983;Loeb, 2005;McGinley et al, 2012). Computational modeling can be used to clarify the tradeoffs between emulating traveling wave mechanics and minimizing the smearing of temporal cues for pitch perception (Cohen, 2009;Karg et al, 2013;Seeber and Bruce, 2016;van Gendt et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AF patterns around the cathodic electrodes appeared to be very similar regardless of the electrode configuration (Figure 7, bottom row), suggesting minimal interaction from the anodic contacts. Interference between the contacts can increase with larger separations between the basilar membrane and the electrode carrier in the scala tympani (Frijns et al, 1996(Frijns et al, , 2001Hanekom, 2001;Briaire and Frijns, 2006;Seeber and Bruce, 2016). The additional AF peaks that emerged for the anodic electrodes in the BP and DB configurations were much weaker in the case of TP.…”
Section: The Af Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor neuroprosthesis has a long history with intensive studies, in particular with the recent techniques where cortical neuronal spikes can be well recorded and used to control neuroprosthesis [6]. In term of sensory neuroprosthesis, cochlear implants are severed as the most widely used neuroprosthesis, and have a fair good performance for helping hearing loss, although there are many remaining questions about how to improve its performance in a noisy environment and its effect on neuronal activity of downstream auditory cortex [11,12]. However, in contrast to the intensive computational modeling of cochlear implants [11], retinal neuroprosthesis is much less well studied, and has a much worse performance for restoring the eyesight, although a few types of retinal neuroprosthesis are being used in clinical trials [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the brain is the central hub to control and exchange information used by our motor, sensory and cognitive behavior, the performance of neuroprosthesis has to rely on how to better analyze the neuronal signal used by neuroprosthesis. Therefore, besides the development of neuroprosthesis hardware, better algorithms are the core feature of neuroprosthesis for better performance [6,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%