2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2000.tb00315.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The History of Balloon Valvuloplasty

Abstract: The birth of therapeutic balloon dilation in the management of cardiovascular disease can be traced to Rashkind who in 1966 developed balloon atrial septostomy for palliation of patients with complete transposition of the great vessels. Actually, Dotter and Judkins anteceded Rashkind by coaxial sequential dilation of iliofemoral atherosclerotic obstruction in 1964. However, it was not until the development by Grüntzig in 1978 of a miniaturized flexible balloon catheter for percutaneous transluminal coronary an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When asked why he did not repeat the procedure given its relative success, he volunteered that he was never referred another patient, physicians declaring it ‘all non-sense’6 and failing to believe that the symptoms of mitral stenosis could be ascribed to a simple obstruction between the left atrium and ventricle. Indeed, Carey Coombs was among these sceptics, declaring that ‘the operation can never become a general method of treatment for a disease of which the mitral lesion is only one feature—to say nothing of the technical difficulties attending surgical approach to this structure’ 7. Sir Thomas Lewis was also dismissive, writing 20 years later that ‘although many symptoms may be complained of by the patients suffering of mitral stenosis, there are none that can be ascribed properly and usefully to this deformity of the valve’ 7.…”
Section: The Pioneersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When asked why he did not repeat the procedure given its relative success, he volunteered that he was never referred another patient, physicians declaring it ‘all non-sense’6 and failing to believe that the symptoms of mitral stenosis could be ascribed to a simple obstruction between the left atrium and ventricle. Indeed, Carey Coombs was among these sceptics, declaring that ‘the operation can never become a general method of treatment for a disease of which the mitral lesion is only one feature—to say nothing of the technical difficulties attending surgical approach to this structure’ 7. Sir Thomas Lewis was also dismissive, writing 20 years later that ‘although many symptoms may be complained of by the patients suffering of mitral stenosis, there are none that can be ascribed properly and usefully to this deformity of the valve’ 7.…”
Section: The Pioneersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Carey Coombs was among these sceptics, declaring that ‘the operation can never become a general method of treatment for a disease of which the mitral lesion is only one feature—to say nothing of the technical difficulties attending surgical approach to this structure’ 7. Sir Thomas Lewis was also dismissive, writing 20 years later that ‘although many symptoms may be complained of by the patients suffering of mitral stenosis, there are none that can be ascribed properly and usefully to this deformity of the valve’ 7. Souttar became a BCS member and eventually spoke about the operation at the 1957 Autumn Meeting.…”
Section: The Pioneersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation