1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07157.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The HIV-specific advance directive

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To determine whether persons living with HIV find a disease-specific advance directive more acceptable than a generic directive. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.SETTING: HIV consumer organization and hospital-based HIV clinic. PARTICIPANTS:Volunteer sample of persons with HIV. INTERVENTIONS:The disease-specific HIV Living Will, the generic Centre for Bioethics Living Will, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the American Academy of Neurology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology have surveyed their memberships on end-of-life issues 21,22 and have published consensus statements on the role of these specialties in palliative care 23,31 .…”
Section: Continuing Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the American Academy of Neurology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology have surveyed their memberships on end-of-life issues 21,22 and have published consensus statements on the role of these specialties in palliative care 23,31 .…”
Section: Continuing Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some efforts have focused on strategies for increasing advance‐directive completion rates 25 using techniques such as computer‐generated reminders, dissemination of educational materials, and targeted mailings. Others have focused on the creation of more meaningful advance directive documents such as ‘values histories’, 26 detailed preference directives 27 and disease‐specific directives 28 . While some of these efforts have had modest success, only the most intense community‐wide efforts have made substantive overall improvements in advance care planning, 29 and these intensive efforts are difficult to replicate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it may be appropriate for patients with certain diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), that have a predictable course near the end of life. 2,9,10 The apparent lack of benefit of advance directives does not mean that a person's preferences and values ought to be discounted when he or she is no longer able to express them directly. Rather, instructive advance directives (i.e., directives that include instructions regarding what interventions should or should not be provided under certain specified circumstances) alone have proven to be ineffective tools to achieve the end of preserving some remnant of individual autonomy after the loss of decisional capacity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%