2005
DOI: 10.2190/tfha-d5k5-kqkk-8de4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Holocaust as a Context for Telling Life Stories

Abstract: Using a narrative approach, this study explores the role of the Holocaust in the life stories of Survivors, contrasted with two comparison groups (one Jewish and one non-Jewish) whose direct experiences did not include surviving the Holocaust. Using the technique of the life line and measures such as number and type of life events identified, as well as the events marking the beginning and ending of the life story, several differences were found between the three groups. Survivors identified an average of 10 l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding our findings on the Holocaust survivors, they coincide with those of other studies indicating that survivors differ from other old people mainly in their negative autobiographical memories, while they largely succeed to preserve their positive recollections isolated from the lingering effects of the trauma (de Vries et al, 2005;Shmotkin et al, 2006). The encapsulation of the emotional impact of the trauma from other periods in life was found beneficial for the present well-being of the survivors (Cohen & Shmotkin, 2007).…”
Section: Explaining the Relations Between Anchor Periods' Ratings Andsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding our findings on the Holocaust survivors, they coincide with those of other studies indicating that survivors differ from other old people mainly in their negative autobiographical memories, while they largely succeed to preserve their positive recollections isolated from the lingering effects of the trauma (de Vries et al, 2005;Shmotkin et al, 2006). The encapsulation of the emotional impact of the trauma from other periods in life was found beneficial for the present well-being of the survivors (Cohen & Shmotkin, 2007).…”
Section: Explaining the Relations Between Anchor Periods' Ratings Andsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This balance of resilience and vulnerability is reflected in, as well as derived from, positive and negative features in the survivors' life narratives (Cohen & Shmotkin, 2007;Shmotkin & Shrira, in press). Thus, the autobiographical past is intricately related to the survivors' satisfaction: Whereas survivors extract happiness from their positive periods much like comparison groups, they experience greater distress from their negative periods compared to other old people (de Vries, Suedfeld, Krell, Blando, & Southard, 2005;Shmotkin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Conflicting Expectations Regarding the Life Story Of Old-oldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that the survivors in this study are coping as successfully with their life experiences, including the aging process, as their peers. This is consistent with three recent studies, all showing that aging, rather than being the ''gateway to psychopathology'' (Lomranz, 2005, p. 257) it was expected to be, is just one more challenge with which survivors are successfully coping (deVries et al, 2005;Schiff, 2005;Suedfeld et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recalling their life, survivors mention twice as many positive significant life events as negative ones (deVries et al, 2005); they also look back with satisfaction on their life as a whole (Suedfeld, 2002). Such findings contradict the stereotype of survivors as guilt-ridden, depressed, and withdrawn (Helmreich, 1992;Suedfeld, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent research has returned to the life course context within which life events are experienced, suggesting that the consequences of life events may be strongly influenced by their timing, perceived relevance, and subjective experience (XX XXXXX, Blando, Southard & Bubeck, 2001; Jang & Haley, 2002). Associated with this is a move away from event recognition and their scalar assessments to more narrative descriptions of events in the context of an individual’s life (XX XXXXX, Suedfeld, Krell, Blando & Southard, 2005; XX XXXXX, & Watt, 1996)—an integration of an event-based perspective with the personal life course narrative (XX XXXXX, 2013) providing an “insider’s” perspective on the individual life course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%