1954
DOI: 10.1112/plms/s3-4.1.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Homotopy Theory of Sphere Bundles Over Spheres (I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this paper is to find non-trivial examples in dimensions (4,3), (8,5) and (16,9) inspired by the early work of Antonelli ( [3,4]). The smooth maps considered in [4] are so-called Montgomery-Samelson fibrations with finitely many singularities where several fibers are pinched to points.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this paper is to find non-trivial examples in dimensions (4,3), (8,5) and (16,9) inspired by the early work of Antonelli ( [3,4]). The smooth maps considered in [4] are so-called Montgomery-Samelson fibrations with finitely many singularities where several fibers are pinched to points.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist precisely two homotopy types among the S 3 -fibrations over S 5 which admit cross-sections (see [9], p. 217). If M 8 is a S 3 -fibration, then it should have a cross-section, because it is homotopy equivalent to S 3 × S 5 and the existence of a cross-section is a homotopy invariant (see [9], p. 196, [10], p. 164). However the two homotopy types correspond to two distinct isomorphism types as spheres bundles.…”
Section: Examples With ϕ =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As m − is even in the case 4B2, this implies that m − = 2, 4 or 8 by [2]. To prove our theorem, we only need to prove that (8,11) cannot occur as the multiplicities of an isoparametric hypersurface with four distinct principal curvatures. Suppose it does occur; by Theorem B the focal manifold F − is almost diffeomorphic to a S 11 -bundle over S …”
Section: Proof Of Theorem Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that m + = 11 if m − = 8 in the case 4B2. We shall prove that (8,11) cannot occur as the multiplicities and combining this with [8] it follows that Theorem A. In the case 4B2 the multiplicities (m − , m + ) of an isoparametric hypersurface with four distinct principal curvatures must be either (2,2) or (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let p l : > S Q be the canonical projection. We denote P U C*Q by a <E Tr^CS*).According to [13], where p is the attaching map of the top cell of £(%). Let Y = S Q U a e n .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%