2008
DOI: 10.1097/01.naj.0000327832.59406.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hospital Admission Risk Profile

Abstract: Older adults are at risk for losing functional ability during and after a hospitalization. It's often difficult to determine which patients are at highest risk and which might benefit from targeted interventions. The Hospital Admission Risk Profile, a simple screening tool, can be used to classify hospitalized older adults as being at low, intermediate, or high risk for losing the ability to perform activities of daily living, based on assessments of age, cognitive function, and the ability to perform independ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the original Sager HARP protocol (Figure ), the LNA used age at the time of admission, modified Folstein MMSE score, and self‐ or family‐reported IADL dependence 2 weeks before admission to calculate a HARP score for each participant . The modified Folstein MMSE omits the language items, and the IADLs evaluated included managing finances, taking medications, use of the telephone, shopping, transportation, housekeeping, and food preparation . Individuals with complete dependence in all ADL categories were included in this study but were excluded from the original HARP validation study (because people with complete ADL dependence had no potential to decline in ADL function) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the original Sager HARP protocol (Figure ), the LNA used age at the time of admission, modified Folstein MMSE score, and self‐ or family‐reported IADL dependence 2 weeks before admission to calculate a HARP score for each participant . The modified Folstein MMSE omits the language items, and the IADLs evaluated included managing finances, taking medications, use of the telephone, shopping, transportation, housekeeping, and food preparation . Individuals with complete dependence in all ADL categories were included in this study but were excluded from the original HARP validation study (because people with complete ADL dependence had no potential to decline in ADL function) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The modified Folstein MMSE omits the language items, and the IADLs evaluated included managing finances, taking medications, use of the telephone, shopping, transportation, housekeeping, and food preparation. 13,17 Individuals with complete dependence in all ADL categories were included in this study but were excluded from the original HARP validation study (because people with complete ADL dependence had no potential to decline in ADL function). 13 Covariates Participant electronic medical record numbers were recorded in a secure database and used to query the data warehouse to obtain additional data.…”
Section: Primary Predictor: Harpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognition was assessed using the standard test at our institution, the abbreviated Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). The abbreviated MMSE was performed and scored according to customary protocol and scale (0–21) [14,15]. Cognitive impairment is defined as a score ≤14 [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abbreviated MMSE was performed and scored according to customary protocol and scale (0–21) [14,15]. Cognitive impairment is defined as a score ≤14 [14]. Cognitive and functional capacity scores were recorded and compared against age quartiles to determine if there was any difference in scores among the age groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%