2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6f76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hubble Space Telescope UV Legacy Survey of Galactic Globular Clusters. XX. Ages of Single and Multiple Stellar Populations in Seven Bulge Globular Clusters

Abstract: In the present work we analyzed seven globular clusters (GCs) selected from their location in the Galactic bulge and with metallicity values in the range −1.30[Fe/H]−0.50. The aim of this work is first to derive cluster ages assuming single stellar populations and second to identify the stars from first (1G) and second generations (2G) from the main sequence, subgiant, and red giant branches, and to derive their age differences. Based on a combination of UV and optical filters used in this project, we ap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(155 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remainder of our sample is relatively old, to a remarkably consistent extent: Their mean age is 12.9±0.4 Gyr, at least as old as any other component of the MWGC age-metallicity relation. This is in excellent agreement with a mean age of 12.86±0.36 Gyr for metal-intermediate (−1.5 [Fe/H] −0.85) bulge globulars quoted by Oliveira et al (2020), who compiled literature ages to update a similar analysis by Saracino et al (2019). However, these age measurements are quite heterogenous, derived using observations in different bandpasses, different age measurement techniques, and in some cases different evolutionary models and different bolometric corrections.…”
Section: The Age-metallicity Relationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The remainder of our sample is relatively old, to a remarkably consistent extent: Their mean age is 12.9±0.4 Gyr, at least as old as any other component of the MWGC age-metallicity relation. This is in excellent agreement with a mean age of 12.86±0.36 Gyr for metal-intermediate (−1.5 [Fe/H] −0.85) bulge globulars quoted by Oliveira et al (2020), who compiled literature ages to update a similar analysis by Saracino et al (2019). However, these age measurements are quite heterogenous, derived using observations in different bandpasses, different age measurement techniques, and in some cases different evolutionary models and different bolometric corrections.…”
Section: The Age-metallicity Relationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We also tested how H 0 can be constrained with the individual very oldest globular clusters with the smallest age errors. For NGC 6362 (13.6 ± 0.5 Gyr) (Oliveira et al 2020) and NGC 6779 (14.9 +0.5 −0.9 Gyr) (Valcin et al 2020), we obtain 68.5 +2.9 −3.2 and 63.1 +3.9 −4.5 km/s/Mpc, respectively. Taken at face value, this exercise highlights the importance of the oldest objects in the context of the Hubble tension.…”
Section: Individual Agesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We also tested how H 0 can be constrained with the individual very oldest globular clusters with the smallest age errors. For NGC 6362 (13.6 ± 0.5 Gyr) (Oliveira et al 2020) and NGC 6779 (14.9 0.9 0.5 -+ Gyr) (Valcin et al 2020), we obtain 68.5 3.2 2.9 -+ and 63.1 4.5 3.9 -+ km s −1 Mpc −1 , respectively. Taken at face value, this exercise highlights the importance of the oldest objects in the context of the Hubble tension.…”
Section: Individual Agesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…). For our purpose, we focused on the most recent results of O'Malley et al (2017),Brown et al (2018),Oliveira et al (2020), andValcin et al (2020) with state-of-art age dating and a careful assessment of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. The oldest GCs have ages 13.5 Gyr with total errors (i.e., combined statistical and systematic) from ∼0.5 Gyr to 1 Gyr.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%