2014
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu132
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders

Abstract: See Sporns (doi:) for a scientific commentary on this article.Brain networks contain a minority of highly connected hub nodes with high topological value and biological cost. Using network analysis of DTI data from healthy volunteers, and meta-analyses of published MRI studies in 26 brain disorders, Crossley et al. show that lesions across disorders tend to be concentrated at hubs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

99
947
3
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,048 publications
(1,055 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(115 reference statements)
99
947
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the overall decrease in network density across age, perhaps in combination with increased vulnerability due to high intrinsic neuronal activity of hub node regions (de Haan et al, 2012). Our findings are in line with previous simulation studies in human and animals, which have shown that computational lesioning of hub regions has stronger effects on structural and functional network topology than lesioning of random nodes (Alstott et al, 2009;Crossley et al, 2014;Kaiser et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may be due to the overall decrease in network density across age, perhaps in combination with increased vulnerability due to high intrinsic neuronal activity of hub node regions (de Haan et al, 2012). Our findings are in line with previous simulation studies in human and animals, which have shown that computational lesioning of hub regions has stronger effects on structural and functional network topology than lesioning of random nodes (Alstott et al, 2009;Crossley et al, 2014;Kaiser et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In general, the aging brain can be characterized by reduced centrality of hub regions with a decrease in global efficiency and an increase in local network clustering. Similar changes in hub regions and subsequent effects on global efficiency have also been characterized in various neurological disorders (Crossley et al, 2014;Stam, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another option is to reduce the number of tests by using measures such as the network‐based statistic (Zalesky, Fornito, & Bullmore, 2010), or to consider graph theoretical measures that produce node‐ or graph‐level values (Kaiser, 2011; Rubinov & Sporns, 2010). This approach has been used in several studies (Betzel et al., 2014; Crossley et al., 2014; Fornito et al., 2011; Fornito, Zalesky, Pantelis, & Bullmore, 2012; Zhou, Gennatas, Kramer, Miller, & Seeley, 2012), however, it fundamentally shifts the research focus from identification of relevant connections to the interpretation of measures that often do not have a known relation to neuro‐biology (Smith, 2012). Lastly, this study included individuals from the general population, rather than solely recruiting “typically developing” children from the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general backbone of cortico‐cortical highways has been described in the healthy human brain using graph theoretical analysis of diffusion weighted imaging tractography, which includes connections between a subset of hub nodes, the so‐called rich club (Hagmann et al, 2008; van den Heuvel, Kahn, Goni, & Sporns, 2012). Mounting evidence suggests that structural brain networks, particularly their backbone, are altered in neurological and psychiatric disorders, and heterogeneity in these alterations is evident between diseases (Bullmore and Sporns, 2009; Crossley et al, 2014; Stam, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%