The human−animal relationship in dairy animals

Napolitano, Fabio; Bragaglio, Andrea; Sabia, Emilio; Serrapica, Francesco; Braghieri, Ada; Rosa, Giuseppe De

doi:10.1017/s0022029920000606

Cited by 24 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2020 was published Comunicação emocional entre o homem e o animal não humano [29], a literature review on emotional communication between human and nonhuman animals, The Power of a Positive Human-Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare [5]; Effects of Long-Term Gentle Handling on Behavioral Responses, Production Performance, and Meat Quality of Pigs [30]; Farmers' representations of the effects of precision livestock farming on the human-animal relationship [31]; The human−animal relationship in dairy animals [32], and Stockpeople and Animal Welfare: Compatibilities, Contradictions, and Unresolved Ethical Dilemmas [33].…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the Attitudes of Livestock Keepers within Animal Production Systems

Marmelo

2022

SciMed. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has been proven that the interactions or relationships established between humans and animals in livestock production significantly affect both. Therefore, it is extremely important that the quality of these interactions be positive and reflect a genuine sense of caring on the part of the people who deal directly with the animals. This study draws on some of the most important publications on the subject from 1986 to 2022 found in article databases; presents the main concepts used to understand the subject; lists the main reasons for what can be considered mistreatment of animals in animal husbandry (negative behaviours); and proposes solutions based on the literature and the author's experience. The purpose of this article is to help a) shift the paradigm and prioritise the definition of a personal profile that should work with animals, rather than focusing exclusively on the technical training of animal caregivers or on the common definition of “stockperson"; b) propose an analytical solution that can be applied during the recruitment process; and c) serve as a basis for the most relevant literature on the subject, given the already large number of publications, and d) encourage mutual reflection. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2022-04-03-04 Full Text: PDF

show abstract

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the Attitudes of Livestock Keepers within Animal Production Systems

Marmelo

2022

SciMed. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The human-dairy cattle interaction and its effects on milk production and welfare status have been extensively examined [10,20,22,39]. Aversive handling and forceful, negative tactile interactions are generally associated with fear, high signs of nervousness, a reluctance to move to the milking parlour, baulking, an increased number of vocalizations or steps [10,20,22], a decreased proportion of conceiving to the first insemination [20], a reduction of the milk yield and a deterioration of the milk quality (i.e., reduced protein and fat levels) [10,20] in dairy cows.…”

Section: Human-dairy Animal Interaction 21 Dairy Cattle and Buffaloesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To meet community demands, targeted cognitive-behavioural training programs and specific protocols aimed at the handling improvement are therefore necessary in dairy farms in order to maintain an improved welfare status and production efficiency [39]. Undoubtedly, the attitudes and skills of the farmer and his/her familiarity with the animals are very important; however, there are also issues-such as job satisfaction and motivation, working conditions and organisational policies and rules-that modify handling practices [20,24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution of Precision Livestock Farming Systems to the Improvement of Welfare Status and Productivity of Dairy Animals

Simitzis

Tzanidakis

Tzamaloukas

et al. 2021

Dairy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the effects of human–dairy cattle interaction have been extensively examined, data concerning small ruminants are scarce. The present review article aims at highlighting the effects of management practices on the productivity, physiology and behaviour of dairy animals. In general, aversive handling is associated with a milk yield reduction and welfare impairment. Precision livestock farming systems have therefore been applied and have rapidly changed the management process with the introduction of technological and computer innovations that contribute to the minimization of animal disturbances, the promotion of good practices and the maintenance of cattle’s welfare status and milk production and farms’ sustainability and competitiveness at high levels. However, although dairy farmers acknowledge the advantages deriving from the application of precision livestock farming advancements, a reluctance concerning their regular application to small ruminants is observed, due to economic and cultural constraints and poor technological infrastructures. As a result, targeted intervention training programmes are also necessary in order to improve the efficacy and efficiency of handling, especially of small ruminants.

show abstract

“…Cows can suffer from heat stress during spring–summer, which impacts their milk production and its quality. It has been reported that heat stress (a temperature humidity index (THI) above 68) negatively impacts their welfare [ 28 ], milk production, and its yield and fat content [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], as well as the milk’s FAP [ 33 ]. Salamon et al [ 34 ] showed higher percentages of C18:2, C18:3 (n-3), C18:1 (Oleic), and CLA in milk obtained during summer compared to those in milk from winter.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Different Conditions during Confinement in Pasture-Based Systems and Feeding Systems Affect the Fatty Acid Profile in the Milk and Cheese of Holstein Dairy Cows

Grille

Escobar

Méndez

et al. 2023

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The diet of dairy cows influences the fatty acid (FA) profiles of their milk and cheese, but how these are affected by different conditions during confinement in a mixed system (MS:grazing + total mixed ration:TMR) is not known. The aim of this study was to compare the FAs of the milk and cheese from MS in a compost-bedded pack barns (CB-GRZ) versus an outdoor soil-bedded pen (OD-GRZ) during confinement, and with a confinement system (100%TMR) in a compost-bedded pack barns (CB-TMR). Individual milk samples (n = 12 cows/group), cheese, and pooled milk (MilkP) samples were collected. The saturated FA percentages in the milk and the omega 6/omega 3 ratio in the MilkP and cheese were greater for the CB-TMR (p < 0.0001), while the unsaturated and monounsaturated FA percentages in the milk were lower for the CB-TMR than the MS (p < 0.001). The milk n-3, C18:3, and conjugated linoleic acid percentages were lower for the CB-TMR than the MS (p < 0.001). The milk n-3 and C18:3 were higher for the CB-GRZ than the OD-GRZ (p < 0.01), but no differences were observed between the MS in the MilkP and cheese. In conclusion, CB-GRZ cows during confinement produced better quality milk compared to OD-GRZ cows. However, the FA profiles of the milk, MilkP, and cheese were affected to a greater extent by the feeding management than by the conditions during confinement.

show abstract

The human−animal relationship in dairy animals

Cited by 24 publications

References 53 publications

Examining the Attitudes of Livestock Keepers within Animal Production Systems

Examining the Attitudes of Livestock Keepers within Animal Production Systems

Contribution of Precision Livestock Farming Systems to the Improvement of Welfare Status and Productivity of Dairy Animals

Different Conditions during Confinement in Pasture-Based Systems and Feeding Systems Affect the Fatty Acid Profile in the Milk and Cheese of Holstein Dairy Cows

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About