2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep35882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The human laryngeal microbiome: effects of cigarette smoke and reflux

Abstract: Prolonged diffuse laryngeal inflammation from smoking and/or reflux is commonly diagnosed as chronic laryngitis and treated empirically with expensive drugs that have not proven effective. Shifts in microbiota have been associated with many inflammatory diseases, though little is known about how resident microbes may contribute to chronic laryngitis. We sought to characterize the core microbiota of disease-free human laryngeal tissue and to investigate shifts in microbial community membership associated with e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
43
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(76 reference statements)
4
43
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The communities found in these pigs were similar to those that have been described in both human false vocal fold biopsies and in lesion samples[11, 14]. Communities were comprised of phyla commonly associated with animals including Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Tenericutes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The communities found in these pigs were similar to those that have been described in both human false vocal fold biopsies and in lesion samples[11, 14]. Communities were comprised of phyla commonly associated with animals including Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Tenericutes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…To date, there are four published studies examining laryngeal microbiota using next-generation sequencing technology[11, 1315], and most of these studies are limited by lack of a true control group. Further, given the paucity of data, there is no consensus on sampling methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations