2016
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316226285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Human Rights-Based Approach to Carbon Finance

Abstract: The Human Rights-Based Approach to Carbon Finance tween climate change and human rights law have re-. of shares in a global carbon budget.3 These authors conclude that of capacity, finance and technologies to tackle climate. rights-based approaches, including procedural safe-. All rights reserved. Carbon. The city-wide approach to carbon finance is one of Cities as Economic Cities, and city-based. and human development. Advancing Climate Justice in International Law-Scholarly. 4 Jul 2016. It outlines a human r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the adaptation discourse, political ecology factors like inequality, power and social injustice have been used commonly as separate social categories to examine localised political ecology ideologies using empirical case studies (Adger et al 2013;Alston 2015;Eriksen et al 2015). In contrast, in the mitigation (and climate finance) discourse, the debates on inequality, power relations and social injustice have been framed at the global level, focusing on policy principles such as market mechanisms, polluter payers and differential equity (Olawuyi 2016). …”
Section: 4political Ecology Theory: Conceptualising Inequality Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the adaptation discourse, political ecology factors like inequality, power and social injustice have been used commonly as separate social categories to examine localised political ecology ideologies using empirical case studies (Adger et al 2013;Alston 2015;Eriksen et al 2015). In contrast, in the mitigation (and climate finance) discourse, the debates on inequality, power relations and social injustice have been framed at the global level, focusing on policy principles such as market mechanisms, polluter payers and differential equity (Olawuyi 2016). …”
Section: 4political Ecology Theory: Conceptualising Inequality Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the mitigation (and climate finance) discourse, the debates on inequality, power relations and social injustice have been framed at the global level, focusing on policy principles such as market mechanisms, polluter payers and differential equity (Olawuyi 2016). Both strands of climate change discourses emphasize that for the most vulnerable communities, the relationship between the three factors are diverse, complex and multi-scaled.…”
Section: Political Ecology Theory: Conceptualizing Inequality Unequamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPCC (2014) affirms that climate change will exacerbate impacts on the welfare of poor smallholder farmers and socially disadvantaged groups in developing countries. Recognizing the unique vulnerabilities of specific groups, many scholars and social advocates have pointed out cases of social injustice, particularly human rights violations induced by climate change and disasters (Finley-Brook and Thomas 2011;Olawuyi 2016). Many of the arguments relating to social injustice draw on alternative political ecology research grounded in neo-Marxist and post-Marxist theories of the late 1980s (see Parks and Roberts 2010).…”
Section: Social Injusticementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations