1896
DOI: 10.1126/science.4.83.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Humanistic Element in Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1896
1896
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…117 In Fisher v. University of Texas, 118 she agreed that the University of Texas's admissions plan should stay in place but objected to the decision to send it back for the lower court to judge it against a more demanding standard, expressing some concern about the majority's strategy to diminish affirmative action over time. 119 Moreover, in Gonzalez v. Carhart, 120 she argued that treating women as incapable of making the difficult choices surrounding second-trimester abortions denied them equal protection. 121 And she read her dissent aloud to emphasize what she called the majority's "alarming" ruling and "effort to chip away" at abortion rights.…”
Section: Common Commitments and Unexplored Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…117 In Fisher v. University of Texas, 118 she agreed that the University of Texas's admissions plan should stay in place but objected to the decision to send it back for the lower court to judge it against a more demanding standard, expressing some concern about the majority's strategy to diminish affirmative action over time. 119 Moreover, in Gonzalez v. Carhart, 120 she argued that treating women as incapable of making the difficult choices surrounding second-trimester abortions denied them equal protection. 121 And she read her dissent aloud to emphasize what she called the majority's "alarming" ruling and "effort to chip away" at abortion rights.…”
Section: Common Commitments and Unexplored Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%