Non-Nuclear Peace 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26688-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Humanitarian Initiative: A Critical Appreciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining the established major powers as ‘nuclear-weapon states’, the NPT ‘effectively legitimizes deterrence’ for a select group of states (Tannenwald 2020 : 125; see also e.g. Ritchie 2019 : 418; Ruzicka 2018 : 372).…”
Section: Legitimizing Nuclear Weapons: Four Categories Of Legitimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining the established major powers as ‘nuclear-weapon states’, the NPT ‘effectively legitimizes deterrence’ for a select group of states (Tannenwald 2020 : 125; see also e.g. Ritchie 2019 : 418; Ruzicka 2018 : 372).…”
Section: Legitimizing Nuclear Weapons: Four Categories Of Legitimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some have argued that the Ban Treaty stigmatizes nuclear weapons somewhat akin to the Chemical Weapons Convention and chemical weapons. Seen this way, "The treaty is not really about providing a framework for disarmament but rather about providing a focal point for stigmatization politics" (Tannenwald 2020). Even so, its capability to stigmatize nuclear weapon possession is limited given the number of nuclear weapon relevant states that oppose it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%