By reflecting on both the exclusionary and the inclusionary role of humanitarian migration and border management in the Central Mediterranean, this paper explores the relationship of humanitarianism with the delocalization of the EU border and with human rights. First, the paper analyses the role of human rights in the institutional humanitarian discourse about migration and border management at the Mediterranean EU border. The paper then analyses the Italian operation Mare Nostrum and, more generally, Italian humanitarianized border management in the Central Mediterranean. In doing this, it shows that humanitarianism contributes to the discursive legitimation and spatial delocalization of exclusionary policies and practices. Moreover, humanitarianism contributes to a symbolically and legally subordinate inclusion of migrants in the European space. While such humanitarian inclusion can be more inclusive than what human rights would require, it is posited as an act of grace rather than an enhancement of human rights. In both its exclusionary and inclusionary dimension, humanitarianism transcends and expands territorial boundaries by outsourcing responsibilities and enhancing delocalized border management. and preventing people from attempting the sea-crossing (e.g. through patrolling in international waters and police cooperation with North African countries). However, the "humanitarian reason" also resulted in increased efforts either to rescue people at sea, close to Libyan waters and sometimes even in Libyan waters, and bring them to Italy, or to open limited humanitarian corridors providing safe passage to selected groups of vulnerable persons. The aim of this paper is to reflect on both the exclusionary and the inclusionary role of humanitarianism, and on how processes of humanitarian exclusion/inclusion interact with the delocalization of the EU border, as well as with human rights.Research on the exclusionary power of humanitarianism in general (Aradau ), as well as of politics of pity (Aradau 2004) and care (Agier 2011; Williams 2015) in particular, is increasing. This body of work shows that humanitarian logics are not incompatible with-and are often instrumental to-restrictive migration policies and migration management practices, which exclude people from territories and/or rights (often resulting in violent or even unlawful and inhuman outcomes).On the contrary, the inclusionary power of humanitarianized migration and border management remains under-researched. A notable exception is the work of Fassin (2005) and Ticktin (2005, 2006), analysing the effects of the illness clause introduced in French immigration law in 1998. This measure allowed authorities to grant residency status for humanitarian reasons to undocumented foreign residents affected by life-threatening pathologies. Thus, while the main doors of labour migration and asylum in France were closed by increasingly restrictive laws and administrative practices, a small window could still be opened by compassion. This shows a particular attitud...