2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hunt for sustainable biocontrol of oomycete plant pathogens, a case study of Phytophthora infestans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, earlier studies have reported inhibition of P. infestans mycelial growth by different Streptomyces strains or their metabolites ( Sinha et al, 2014 ; Bermejo et al, 2020 ; Feng et al, 2021 ). However, in vitro inhibition activities on P. infestans are no warranty for the ability of the strains to restrict disease progress on plant material such as leaf discs or full plants, which in turn do not warrant efficacy in the field ( Guyer et al, 2015 ; Hashemi et al, 2021 ). To the best of our knowledge, only two studies reported protective potential of Actinomycetes against P. infestans in full plant assays, the first on tomato and chili ( Loliam et al, 2012 ), and the second on potato tubers ( Feng et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, earlier studies have reported inhibition of P. infestans mycelial growth by different Streptomyces strains or their metabolites ( Sinha et al, 2014 ; Bermejo et al, 2020 ; Feng et al, 2021 ). However, in vitro inhibition activities on P. infestans are no warranty for the ability of the strains to restrict disease progress on plant material such as leaf discs or full plants, which in turn do not warrant efficacy in the field ( Guyer et al, 2015 ; Hashemi et al, 2021 ). To the best of our knowledge, only two studies reported protective potential of Actinomycetes against P. infestans in full plant assays, the first on tomato and chili ( Loliam et al, 2012 ), and the second on potato tubers ( Feng et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other OGBa strains are currently approved for the control of fungal diseases of plants, in the EU namely Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713, AH2, IT45, MBI 600, FZB24 and D747, and Bacillus velezensis RTI301. These are the active ingredients in fungicides like SERENADE Max, TAEGRO, Kodiak and Double Nickel 55 [20,32]. In addition, we found several different M. pulcherrimia yeast strains (#118, #195, #196, #197, #332, #482 and #483) which were highly active against P. cinnamomi in vitro, and which might be interesting candidates for the development of a biocontrol agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Whilst pesticides are efficient at controlling this disease, they have certain drawbacks: an environmental and economic burden, food safety problems and human health threats, and the opportunity for drug-resistant strains to emerge [ 7 , 9 , 10 ]. Considering the threat to the environment, the EU has implemented directives on reducing the use of synthetic pesticides and increasing sustainable alternative disease control strategies [ 11 ]. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop alternative methods to reduce the use of pesticides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological control, an alternative to pesticides, can be defined as the application of beneficial microorganisms to counteract plant pathogens, to reduce the symptoms of diseases [ 11 , 12 ]. Endophytes refer to microbes that colonize plant tissues or organs for part or all of their life cycles without causing adverse plant symptoms, including endophytic fungi, bacteria, and actinomyces [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%