1966
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3950(66)90007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hydrodynamic behaviour of macromolecules in laminar flow at a small velocity gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All concentrations were in the zone of high dilutions where the Debye parameter c[η] 15 characterizing the degree of dilution was in the range 0.01 e c[η] e 0.1. 16 These conditions of dilution are allowing reliable extrapolation to zero concentration and estimation also of the concentration parameters. The continuous particle size distribution c(s) of Sedfit 17,18 was used for data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All concentrations were in the zone of high dilutions where the Debye parameter c[η] 15 characterizing the degree of dilution was in the range 0.01 e c[η] e 0.1. 16 These conditions of dilution are allowing reliable extrapolation to zero concentration and estimation also of the concentration parameters. The continuous particle size distribution c(s) of Sedfit 17,18 was used for data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under preaveraging of the hydrodynamic interactions, eq 2.27 is not only exact, but the offdiagonal components of the friction tensor, f*y, are absent, and eq 2.28 simplifies to a previously known result. 2,9,10 However, it should be noted that the preaveraged result is not always an upper bound to the exact one. For complete neglect of the hydrodynamic interactions, the friction tensor is diagonal in j and k, £¡k = I, and eq 2.28 reduces further to a slightly more general form of the early result of Kramers8 and Debye.11 In Appendix A, using Kirkwood's approximate expressions for the diffusion tensor and segment velocities, we show that eq 2.27 and 2.28 are valid for all rigid bodies of revolution whose translational and rotational motions are not coupled.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%