2009
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/72/9/096601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms

Abstract: Cell motility in viscous fluids is ubiquitous and affects many biological processes, including reproduction, infection and the marine life ecosystem. Here we review the biophysical and mechanical principles of locomotion at the small scales relevant to cell swimming, tens of micrometers and below. At this scale, inertia is unimportant and the Reynolds number is small. Our emphasis is on the simple physical picture and fundamental flow physics phenomena in this regime. We first give a brief overview of the mech… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

48
2,501
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,256 publications
(2,556 citation statements)
references
References 319 publications
(580 reference statements)
48
2,501
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Another fundamental aspect in the investigation of microswimmers is the effect of hydrodynamic interactions [52], and how do these compare with the effect of concentration or temperature gradients. In the case of self-propelled particles, the temperature or concentration distributions decay with 1/r around the particle, such that their gradients decay as 1/r 2 .…”
Section: Flow Field Around Phoretic Swimmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another fundamental aspect in the investigation of microswimmers is the effect of hydrodynamic interactions [52], and how do these compare with the effect of concentration or temperature gradients. In the case of self-propelled particles, the temperature or concentration distributions decay with 1/r around the particle, such that their gradients decay as 1/r 2 .…”
Section: Flow Field Around Phoretic Swimmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of self-propelled particles, the temperature or concentration distributions decay with 1/r around the particle, such that their gradients decay as 1/r 2 . Furthermore, the hydrodynamic interactions have shown to be fundamentally different for swimmers of various geometries and propulsion mechanisms, yielding to phenomenologically different behaviors classified in three types, pullers, pushers, and neutral swimmers [52]. In the following, we investigate the solvent velocity fields generated by the self-phoretic Janus particles, as well as those generated by self-phoretic microdimers, and in both cases the analytical predictions are compared with simulation results.…”
Section: Flow Field Around Phoretic Swimmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] Conceptually this task benets from a rather good theoretical understanding, as these swimmers oen can be effectively described by point force dipoles (stokeslets). 8,9 The situation is very different for objects that are self-propelled along so and deformable substrateslike crawling cells (keratocytes, broblasts, leukocytes etc.). Here the force transfer is nontrivial and the overall behavior depends on the adhesion mechanism and its interplay with the substrate's surface (chemical, topographical) and elastic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is noted that large nanoswimmers (with a 400 nm diameter) swim nearly 3-fold faster than the smaller (100 nm) ones. The speed of helical swimmers is dependent upon various geometric parameters (including the diameter) and the rotation frequency, in a complex manner described in eqn (1): 23,33 v ¼…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%