1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf00235437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hydrogen method of measuring local blood flow in subcortical structures of the brain: Including a comparative study with the 14C antipyrine method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of these unresolved problems, it is worthy of note in our data that the mean values of CBF(photoelectric) and CBF(H2) in the anesthe tized state were generally in good agreement and comparable with those reported by others (Fieschi et al, 1969). The flow changes with CO2 inhalation were comparable to those reported by Reivich (1964) as 1.3 mI· 100 g-I .…”
Section: Assumptions and Flow Valuessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regardless of these unresolved problems, it is worthy of note in our data that the mean values of CBF(photoelectric) and CBF(H2) in the anesthe tized state were generally in good agreement and comparable with those reported by others (Fieschi et al, 1969). The flow changes with CO2 inhalation were comparable to those reported by Reivich (1964) as 1.3 mI· 100 g-I .…”
Section: Assumptions and Flow Valuessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…"'· •• Similar measurements have been made after carotid injection of H.6" or by a combination of inhalation and injection. 70 The values obtained for CBF in cortical gray matter and white matter with this method (83 ml and 19 ml/100 gm per minute) agree well with those obtained by other techniques. "…”
Section: Local and Regional Cbfsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…18 The absolute CO 2 -R calculated from their data shows a considerable variation between 1.85 and 7.47 ml/100 g per min/mmHg. It must be considered, however, that these absolute CO 2 -R values base on two CBF determinations at different PaCO 2 only, which might give unstable results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%