2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hydrologic model as a source of nutrient loading uncertainty in a future climate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuwaja et al [10] assessed the inherent uncertainty in the capability of climate models and hydrological models to forecast water discharge and nutrient transport in the Maumee River watershed for the period 2046-2065 by forcing five distinct SWAT models with six different climate models from the CMIP5 ensemble. They found out that the hydrologic models can create greater uncertainties than the climate models in water quality forecasts, because hydrologic models created greater uncertainty in total phosphorus and dissolved reactive phosphorus forecast, while the dominant source of uncertainty in total nitrogen forecast was attributed to the climate models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuwaja et al [10] assessed the inherent uncertainty in the capability of climate models and hydrological models to forecast water discharge and nutrient transport in the Maumee River watershed for the period 2046-2065 by forcing five distinct SWAT models with six different climate models from the CMIP5 ensemble. They found out that the hydrologic models can create greater uncertainties than the climate models in water quality forecasts, because hydrologic models created greater uncertainty in total phosphorus and dissolved reactive phosphorus forecast, while the dominant source of uncertainty in total nitrogen forecast was attributed to the climate models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using projected climate from six CMIP5 ESMs under the RCP8.5 scenario, Kujawa et al. (2020) demonstrated that variation among climate models was the dominant source of uncertainty in predicting future total discharge and total N loading in a watershed located in northwest Ohio. This study supports our findings regarding uncertainty sources in projected discharge and N loading in the MARB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other input drivers being equal, model simulations indicate that the estimated discharge and N loading show a larger uncertainty under the RCP8.5 scenario than the RCP4.5 scenario (Figures 3a and 3b), corresponding to the divergence among future climate projections. Using projected climate from six CMIP5 ESMs under the RCP8.5 scenario, Kujawa et al (2020) demonstrated that variation among climate models was the dominant source of uncertainty in predicting future total discharge and total N loading in a watershed located in northwest Ohio. This study supports our findings regarding uncertainty sources in projected discharge and N loading in the MARB.…”
Section: Impacts Of Future Precipitation Change On Water Yield and Ni...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen was more clearly reduced with conservation in the mid‐century (ΔICMC) because the effects of climate alone reduced TN without additional conservation (Kujawa et al. 2020). Therefore, the combined effects of climate change and IC decreased TN loadings further in the mid‐century (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%