In a recent study, Cohen and Glashow argue that superluminal neutrinos of the type recently reported by OPERA should be affected by anomalous Cherenkov-like processes. This causes them to loose much of their energy before reaching the OPERA detectors. Related concerns were reported also by Gonzalez-Mestres, Bi et al, and Cowsik et al, who argued that pions cannot decay to superluminal neutrinos over part of the energy range studied by OPERA. We observe here that these arguments are set within a framework in which Lorentz symmetry is broken, by the presence of a preferred frame. We further show that these anomalous processes are forbidden if Lorentz symmetry is instead "deformed", preserving the relativity of inertial frames. These deformations add non-linear terms to energy momentum relations, conservation laws and Lorentz transformations in a way that is consistent with the relativity of inertial observers.The OPERA collaboration recently reported [1] evidence of superluminal behavior for µ neutrinos with energies of a few tens of GeVs: v − 1 ≃ 2.4 · 10 −5 , with a significance of six standard deviations (we use units such that the speed of light is c = 1). As usual in science, when a particularly striking experimental result is first reported, the most likely hypothesis is that some unknown bias or source of uncertainty affects these OPERA data. However, the result would be of such potential importance that it behoves us to at least investigate what is the second most likely hypothesis that is consistent with all the relevant data, including OPERA, and gives a reasonable path for physics to go ahead. In the event that the OPERA data is right, we must, by the development of such an hypothesis, come to understand special relativity as an approximation to deeper physics. This is of no small importance because a particular hypothesis that can explain all the relevant data can serve to predict other experiments. These predictions, if confirmed, would strengthen the case that there really are departures from special relativity.However, a recent letter by Cohen and Glashow [2] appears to indicate that there cannot be such a second hypothesis, since it claims that the OPERA results are self-contradictory. Cohen and Glashow argue that neutrinos in OPERA's CNGS beam, if superluminal as described in Ref.[1], would loose much of their energy via Cherenkov-like processes on their way from CERN to Gran Sasso. They then could not be detected with energy in excess of 12GeV , contrary to what is also reported [1] by OPERA. And a similar message is contained in studies by , by Bi et al [4], and by Cowsik et al [5], which argued that the reported superluminality of µ neutrinos would even prevent, over part of the energy range studied by OPERA, the pion-decay processes at CERN, which are partly responsible for the flux of neutrinos reaching Gran Sasso. If these arguments are correct, then it seems unavoidable that the OPERA results are mistaken.But, as we show here, there is a loophole 1 in the arguments reported in Refs. [2-5], ...