2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.29.20116905
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The All of Us Research Program: data quality, utility, and diversity

Abstract: Importance: The All of Us Research Program hypothesizes that accruing one million or more diverse participants engaged in a longitudinal research cohort will advance precision medicine and ultimately improve human health. Launched nationally in 2018, to date All of Us has recruited more than 345,000 participants. All of Us plans to open beta access to researchers in May 2020. Objective: To demonstrate the quality, utility, and diversity of the All of Us Research Programs initial data release and beta launch of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial release of data and tools used in this work was published recently. 11 Results reported are in compliance with the All of Us Data and Statistics Dissemination Policy disallowing disclosure of group counts under 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial release of data and tools used in this work was published recently. 11 Results reported are in compliance with the All of Us Data and Statistics Dissemination Policy disallowing disclosure of group counts under 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Demonstration projects were designed to describe the cohort, replicate previous findings for data validation, and avoid novel discovery in line with the program value to ensure equal access by researchers to the data. 11 The work described here was proposed by Consortium members, reviewed and overseen by the program’s Science Committee, and was confirmed as meeting criteria for non-human subjects research by the All of Us Institutional Review Board. The initial release of data and tools used in this work was published recently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our analysis of deidentified data was classified as research not involving human subjects by the All of Us institutional review board. The initial release of data and tools used in our study was published recently ( 7 ). Results reported are in compliance with the All of Us Data and Statistics Dissemination Policy disallowing disclosure of results in group counts under 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight is recorded in kilograms to the nearest 0.1 kg. Clinical data on height, weight, and calculated body mass index (BMI) (weight in kg/height in m 2 ) that were collected and recorded in participant EHRs during in-person clinical visits for routine patient care were extracted and transformed into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership common format at each enrollment site ( 7 ). For our analysis, height and weight values from physical measurements visits and EHR data were used to calculate BMI from both data sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social work engagement enriches the participatory experience, leading to stronger community engagement and partnership. Ultimately, the effort improves recruitment and retention, maximizesMeasures Race and ethnicity Race and ethnicity are self-identified, using methods identical to the according to the Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program (PMI-AURP; Precision Medicine InitiativeWorking Group Report99 . Participants self-identify racial and ethnic categories that apply to them (i.e., American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black or African American or African, Hispanic/Latino or Spanish, Middle Eastern or North African, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and White).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%