2016
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheDeepwater HorizonOil Spill and Physical Health among Adult Women in Southern Louisiana: The Women and Their Children’s Health (WaTCH) Study

Abstract: Background:The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (DHOS) is the largest oil spill in U.S. history, negatively impacting Gulf Coast residents and the surrounding ecosystem. To date, no studies have been published concerning physical health outcomes associated with the DHOS in the general community.Objectives:We characterized individual DHOS exposure using survey data and examined the association between DHOS exposure and physical health.Methods:Baseline data from 2,126 adult women residing in southern Louisiana and en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of the study are presented elsewhere. 5,31 Briefly, women were randomly recruited through an address-based sampling frame. Women were eligible to participate if they were between 18 and 80 years old and lived in the study area at the time of the oil spill.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the study are presented elsewhere. 5,31 Briefly, women were randomly recruited through an address-based sampling frame. Women were eligible to participate if they were between 18 and 80 years old and lived in the study area at the time of the oil spill.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligibility criteria for women of the WaTCH Study included being a female between 18 and 80 years old and residence in southeastern Louisiana at the time of the DHOS (April 20, 2010). Sampling methods and participant recruitment were described in previous publications [27,31]. The WaTCH Study response rate of 45% [31] was acceptable based on the American Association of Public Opinion’s standard [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling methods and participant recruitment were described in previous publications [27,31]. The WaTCH Study response rate of 45% [31] was acceptable based on the American Association of Public Opinion’s standard [32]. Though there was no data available on the characteristics of non-respondents, we compared the WaTCH population to the source population of southern Louisiana residents using 2010 U.S. Census and American Community Survey estimates data (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Fitzgerald and Gohlke, 2014;Evans et al, 2015;Hall et al, 2008;Evans and Crumley, 2005) Since the coastal versus inland children consume different types of seafood, future studies may be needed to assess MeHg levels in the coastal population. The overall response rate in the study was about 60% which is two to three times higher than the response rates in other DWH oil spill studies (60% vs 39%) (Wilson et al, 2015); 60% vs. 14.9% (Peres et al, 2016) and similar to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) surveys. (Buttke et al, 2012) It was not feasible to evaluate the seafood consumption of children whose parents (∼40%) had not responded to the survey.…”
Section: Seafood Consumption (Days Per Week)mentioning
confidence: 48%