2020
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ficus erecta genome aids Ceratocystis canker resistance breeding in common fig (F. carica)

Abstract: SummaryFicus erecta, a wild relative of the common fig (F. carica), is a donor of Ceratocystis canker resistance in fig breeding programmes. Interspecific hybridization followed by recurrent backcrossing is an effective method to transfer the resistance trait from wild to cultivated fig. However, this process is time consuming and labour intensive for trees, especially for gynodioecious plants such as fig. In this study, genome resources were developed for F. erecta to facilitate fig breeding programmes. The g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2014b; Shirasawa et al. , 2020), whereas M. alba and ramie plants contained 14 chromosomes (Jiao et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2014b; Shirasawa et al. , 2020), whereas M. alba and ramie plants contained 14 chromosomes (Jiao et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we downloaded total 3.9 G data of highquality reads (NCBI accession # DRR187744) using the fastqdump software, which was released by the F. erecta genome sequencing project (Shirasawa et al 2019). The individual for sequencing was a male F. erecta tree "FE-Hiroshima-1" which was grown naturally in Higashi-Hiroshima city in Japan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erecta genome sequencing project (Shirasawa et al. 2019 ). The individual for sequencing was a male F .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences were obtained using the HiSeq 2000 system in the paired-end mode, with a read length of 151 bp. The generated data were processed as described by Shirasawa et al (2020) . High-quality reads were selected by trimming adapters with fastx_clipper (parameter: -a AGATCGGAAGAGC) in the FASTX Toolkit (version 0.0.13) 1 and deleting low-quality bases with PRINSEQ (version 0.20.4) ( Schmieder and Edwards, 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SNP effects were categorized using SnpEff (version 3.0) The default parameters of SnpEff were used to analyze variant effects ( Cingolani et al, 2012 ). Genes were predicted and annotated according to previousinformation ( Shirasawa et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%