2017
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02260-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The groEL Gene Is a Promising Target for Species-Level Identification of Tsukamurella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teng et al. [53] used 16S rRNA, ssrA (small stable RNA), secA (secretory), rpoB and groEL for differentiation of Tsukamurella species; results indicated that only 16S rRNA and groEL were effective in indicating the exact species. Teng et al.…”
Section: Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Teng et al. [53] used 16S rRNA, ssrA (small stable RNA), secA (secretory), rpoB and groEL for differentiation of Tsukamurella species; results indicated that only 16S rRNA and groEL were effective in indicating the exact species. Teng et al.…”
Section: Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the evidence of Teng et al. [8] , [53] , the 16S rRNA gene was unsuccessful in differentiating T. sinensis from some strains such as T. pulmonis and T. tyrosinosolven; furthermore, secA 1 failed to differentiate between Tsukamurella spumae and Tsukamurella pseudospumae. Two primers used for the hsp65 gene included TB11 (5′-ACCAACGATGGTGTGTCCAT-3′) and TB12 (5′-CTTGTCGAACCGCATACCCT-3′); the results indicated that T. spumae was the cause of an infection in that case report; for 16S rRNA gene sequencing, LPW27807 (5′-TGGCTCAGGACGAACGCT-3′) and LPW27808 (5′-GAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′) were used [50] .…”
Section: Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 ), in particularly, the ribosomal proteins that are highly expressed [ 153 ] and enriched by the extraction protocols [ 154 ]. This feature is of phylogenetic importance: in a large-scale study published by researchers at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), it was found that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is rampant among the prokaryotes and even involved some of the traditional phylogenetic marker genes such as groEL [ [155] , [156] , [157] ], whereas no HGT event was found in the study for any of the ribosomal proteins [ 158 ]. If phylogenetic methods, such as maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood [ 159 , 160 ] or Bayesian methods [ 161 ] with appropriate priors can be applied to the analysis of MALDI-TOF ribosomal protein signatures, this widespread clinical method will hold promise to a new generation of low-cost, high-resolution microbial phylogeny – perhaps for the first time in microbiology, initiating not from reference laboratories or research centres, but rather from the network of service laboratories routinely using the MALDI-TOF MS technology and cumulating as novel proposals for bacterial and fungal classification and species discovery.…”
Section: Clinical Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various studied gene targets, the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene has been the most widely used for bacterial identification and classification 32 , 33 . However, our previous study showed that this gene target cannot be confidently used for species identification of Tsukamurella as highly similar 16S rRNA gene sequence can be shared by different Tsukamurella species 34 . Sequencing of an alternative gene target, the groEL gene, was shown to be useful and accurate for identification of all existing Tsukamurella species 34 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, our previous study showed that this gene target cannot be confidently used for species identification of Tsukamurella as highly similar 16S rRNA gene sequence can be shared by different Tsukamurella species 34 . Sequencing of an alternative gene target, the groEL gene, was shown to be useful and accurate for identification of all existing Tsukamurella species 34 . Nevertheless, PCR sequencing is still considered expensive, time-consuming and technically demanding, and therefore is yet to be incorporated as a routine identification method in clinical microbiology laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%