2005
DOI: 10.1086/497420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “K‐Correction” for Irradiated Emission Lines in LMXBs: Evidence for a Massive Neutron Star in X1822−371 (V691 CrA)

Abstract: We study the K-correction for the case of emission lines formed in the X-ray-illuminated atmosphere of a Roche lobe-filling star. We compute the K-correction as a function of the mass ratio q and the disk flaring angle using a compact binary code in which the companion's Roche lobe is divided into 10 5 resolution elements. We also study the effect of the inclination angle in the results. We apply our model to the case of the neutron star low-mass X-ray binary X1822À371 (V691 CrA), where a K-emission velocity K… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
125
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
125
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can further constrain the mass function by applying the so-called K-correction (Muñoz-Darias et al 2005) and using the fact that K 1 = 16.32 km s −1 (Chakrabarty & Morgan 1998). The largest K-correction possible is when we assume that there is no accretion disc and almost all radiation is produced in the L 1 point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can further constrain the mass function by applying the so-called K-correction (Muñoz-Darias et al 2005) and using the fact that K 1 = 16.32 km s −1 (Chakrabarty & Morgan 1998). The largest K-correction possible is when we assume that there is no accretion disc and almost all radiation is produced in the L 1 point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correcting from K N III to the true amplitude K 2 of secondary star's radial curve requires a model for the distribution of the N III λ4640 emission across the face of the secondary star. Muñoz-Darias et al (2005 have developed such a model and used it to deduce 1.52 M ⊙ < m N S < 1.85 M ⊙ . In their model the N III λ4640 line is emitted uniformly over the face of the irradiated secondary except where shadowed by a simple thin disk with a raised, optically-thick rim.…”
Section: The Masses and Dimensions Of 4u1822-371mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other indications in favor of the existence of massive neutron stars: 1.8M ⊙ for Vela X-1 [2] and 2M ⊙ for 4U 1822-371 [3]. In particular, this new limits on maximal mass of neutron star excluded many EOS, including hyperons and/or quarks EOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%