A Companion to Plutarch 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118316450.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheLives of the Caesars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Therefore, we can conclude that Plutarch and Tacitus relied on similar sources for their texts; we can also assume that this is true of Plutarch's biography of Nero. There are several mutual sources; namely Cluvius Rufus 34 and Pliny the Elder, 35 as well as another possible author, 36 unknown to this day. In the case of the Pisonian conspiracy, Tacitus explicitly specifies Pliny as one of his sources, 37 but he may also have been drawing from Fabius Rusticus, 38 as well as from other, unidentifiable authors, 39 including the registers of the Roman senate (commentarii senatus).…”
Section: Plutarch's Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Therefore, we can conclude that Plutarch and Tacitus relied on similar sources for their texts; we can also assume that this is true of Plutarch's biography of Nero. There are several mutual sources; namely Cluvius Rufus 34 and Pliny the Elder, 35 as well as another possible author, 36 unknown to this day. In the case of the Pisonian conspiracy, Tacitus explicitly specifies Pliny as one of his sources, 37 but he may also have been drawing from Fabius Rusticus, 38 as well as from other, unidentifiable authors, 39 including the registers of the Roman senate (commentarii senatus).…”
Section: Plutarch's Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 70 Suetonius’ use of Plutarch is tenuously proposed by Krause 1831: 6; Della Corte 1958: 139–48; Jones 1971: 61–2; Baldwin 1979a: 115–18 = 1983: 86–90 = 1989b: 26–9; 1983: 49, 117–18, 181, 294, 509, 526, 544–6; contra , see Bowersock 1998: 195, 205; Hägg 2012: 240–1; Fantham 2013b: 189; Geiger 2014: 302; Georgiadou 2014: 259–60; cf. Wardle 1998: 430–1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%