2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/151
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THEMBH-LSPHEROIDRELATION AT HIGH AND LOW MASSES, THE QUADRATIC GROWTH OF BLACK HOLES, AND INTERMEDIATE-MASS BLACK HOLE CANDIDATES

Abstract: From a sample of 72 galaxies with reliable supermassive black hole masses M bh , we derive the M bh -(host spheroid luminosity, L) relation for i) the subsample of 24 core-Sérsic galaxies with partially depleted cores, and ii) the remaining subsample of 48 Sérsic galaxies. Using K s -band Two Micron All Sky Survey data, we find the near-linear relation M bh ∝ L 1.10±0.20 Ks for the core-Sérsic spheroids thought to be built in additive dry merger events, while M bh ∝ L 2.73±0.55 Ks for the Sérsic spheroids buil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
257
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 297 publications
(309 reference statements)
12
257
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the well known MBH − σ (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000;Gebhardt et al 2000) and MBH −L (Marconi & Hunt 2003;Graham & Scott 2013) relations, the strong R b − σ and R b − L correlations in Section 4.1 hint at a tight R b − MBH relation. This trend is observed in Fig.…”
Section: Core Size Versus Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the well known MBH − σ (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000;Gebhardt et al 2000) and MBH −L (Marconi & Hunt 2003;Graham & Scott 2013) relations, the strong R b − σ and R b − L correlations in Section 4.1 hint at a tight R b − MBH relation. This trend is observed in Fig.…”
Section: Core Size Versus Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…8, and quantified in Table 3 for our sample of 31 galaxies. Eight of these galaxies have direct SMBH mass measurements, while the remaining SMBH masses were predicted using either the Graham & Scott (2013) "non-barred MBH − σ" relation 8 log MBH M ⊙ = (5.53±0.34) log σ 200 kms −1 + (8.22 ±0.05), (13) or their B-band core-Sérsic MBH − L relation which is converted here to V -band using B − V = 1.0 (Fukugita et al 1995;Faber et al 1997), to give Figure 8. Correlation between core-Sérsic break radius R b (Table 2) and black hole mass.…”
Section: Core Size Versus Black Hole Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boyle & Terlevich 1998;Merloni et al 2004;Aird et al 2010;Madau & Dickinson 2014) and 4) a tight correlation is found between the BH and stellar mass of the host galaxy bulge (e.g. Magorrian et al 1998;McConnell & Ma 2013;Graham & Scott 2013;Kormendy & Ho 2013). There are several examples of composite objects showing both AGN and star formation activity, in the literature (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These empirical correlations suggest that the growth of the central SBH and the host galaxy are fundamentally interlinked. Active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback may be responsible for the correlations observed (Silk & Rees 1998;King 2003;Fabian 2012), although it has also been argued that the origin of the observed relations is entirely non-causal and is a natural consequence of mergerdriven galaxy growth (Peng 2007;Jahnke & Macciò 2011;Graham & Scott 2013). The energy released from the central SBH is several orders more than the binding energy of massive galaxies (Fabian 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%