2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theq= 1 peak in the mass-ratios for Hipparcos visual binaries

Abstract: Aims. The magnitude differences for Hipparcos visual binaries give important information about the upper part of their mass-ratio distribution, and in previous studies, the author found a narrow peak at q = 1 This excess of equal-mass, wide pairs has not been confirmed in other studies, and the present work aims to strengthen the Hipparcos results. Methods. We construct a Galaxy model with binaries of known properties, filter it through a "Hipparcos-like" selection model, and then compare the model with the ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the fact that the fraction of twins decreases with increasing separation, the mass ratio distributions of both the short‐ and long‐period binaries appear to have a peak at M 2 / M 1 = 1 (e.g. Tokovinin 2000b; Halbwachs et al 2003; Söderhjelm 2007). These observed relations are in qualitative agreement with the decreasing median mass ratio with increasing separation discussed above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the fact that the fraction of twins decreases with increasing separation, the mass ratio distributions of both the short‐ and long‐period binaries appear to have a peak at M 2 / M 1 = 1 (e.g. Tokovinin 2000b; Halbwachs et al 2003; Söderhjelm 2007). These observed relations are in qualitative agreement with the decreasing median mass ratio with increasing separation discussed above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak at q = 1 which historically has always been a matter of debate (as it may be produced e.g. by a photometric selection bias of twins) seems to be present at small periods, and it may even decrease with mass [37]. Concerning this point, but also more generally, the simulated models should absolutely not be taken at face value as there is a considerable statistical uncertainty in the published results.…”
Section: Mass-ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bias can be dramatic if the initial-mass-ratio distribution is flat, i.e. dN ∝ dq, or even worse if it favours the formation of binaries with equal masses (often referred to as the "twin peak", see e.g., Söderhjelm 2007;Lucy 2006;Simon & Obbie 2009). In this case, the intrinsic population of pre-CVs would be dominated by systems with relatively massive secondary stars.…”
Section: Mass Growth In Cvs?mentioning
confidence: 99%