1995
DOI: 10.1002/yea.320110903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae FLO1 flocculation gene encodes for a cell surface protein

Abstract: The sequencing of a 6619 bp region encoding for a flocculation gene previously cloned from a strain defined as FLO5 (Bidard et al., 1994) has revealed that it was a FLO1 gene. The FLO1 gene product has been localized at the cell surface of the yeast cell by immunofluorescent microscopy. The Flo1 protein contains four regions with repeated sequences which account for about 70% of the amino acids of this protein. A functional analysis of the major repeated region has revealed that it plays an important role in d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MADS-box residue 1 is a glycine in all three proteins, while in the 11 to 15 region, residue 13, which is crucial for but not sufficient to determine MEF2 binding specificity, is an acidic residue, found previously only in MEF2 family members (36,47). This conservation suggests that the yeast proteins may recognize a consensus sequence similar to that of MEF2, CTA(T/A) 4 TAG. The C-terminal regions of Smp1 and Rlm1 are also related, but more distantly, exhibiting 27% identity and an additional 15% similarity.…”
Section: Smp1 and Rlm1 Are Potential S Cerevisiae Mef2 Homologsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MADS-box residue 1 is a glycine in all three proteins, while in the 11 to 15 region, residue 13, which is crucial for but not sufficient to determine MEF2 binding specificity, is an acidic residue, found previously only in MEF2 family members (36,47). This conservation suggests that the yeast proteins may recognize a consensus sequence similar to that of MEF2, CTA(T/A) 4 TAG. The C-terminal regions of Smp1 and Rlm1 are also related, but more distantly, exhibiting 27% identity and an additional 15% similarity.…”
Section: Smp1 and Rlm1 Are Potential S Cerevisiae Mef2 Homologsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We have characterized the DNA binding properties of two yeast MADS-box proteins, Rlm1 (54) and Smp1 (encoded by the YBR182C open reading frame [10,14]), whose DNA-binding and dimerization domains are most closely related to those of the metazoan MEF2 family of transcription factors (39,58). The two proteins indeed exhibit distinct but related MEF2-like DNAbinding specificities: although both proteins can bind the MEF2 core consensus sequence CTA(T/A) 4 TAG, Smp1 exhibits an additional sequence preference, RYT(not C), at the 5Ј side of the MEF2 core consensus. Smp1 can therefore bind only a subset of MEF2 motifs efficiently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FLO1, which is one of the dominant flocculation genes, has been cloned and sequenced by three groups (Bidard et al, 1995;Teunissen et al, 1993;Watari et al, 1994b). Recently it was shown that FLO1 should be a structural gene coding for a cell surface protein, which has a key role in the mechanism of yeast flocculation, because of the localization of its product (Bidard et al, 1995), the similarity of the N-terminal sequence between the putative FLO1 product and a protein that was purified from flocculent yeast cell surface, and the stimulative effect on the flocculation ability of the yeast cells (Straver, 1994 Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan (Received July 17, 1998; Accepted October 8, 1998) A nonflocculent industrial polyploid yeast strain, Saccharomyces cerevisiae 396-9-6V, was converted to a flocculent one by introducing a functional FLO1 gene at the URA3 locus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently it was shown that FLO1 should be a structural gene coding for a cell surface protein, which has a key role in the mechanism of yeast flocculation, because of the localization of its product (Bidard et al, 1995), the similarity of the N-terminal sequence between the putative FLO1 product and a protein that was purified from flocculent yeast cell surface, and the stimulative effect on the flocculation ability of the yeast cells (Straver, 1994). Moreover, introducing FLO1 into nonflocculent beer yeast strains as plasmids and by the chromosomal inBreeding of flocculent industrial alcohol yeast strains by self-cloning of the flocculation gene FLO1 and repeated-batch fermentation by transformants tegration method conferred a flocculent phenotype (Watari et al, 1991(Watari et al, , 1994a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%