2015
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2015.278.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheW-entropy formula for the Witten Laplacian on manifolds with time dependent metrics and potentials

Abstract: In this paper, we develop a new approach to prove the W -entropy formula for the Witten Laplacian via warped product on Riemannian manifolds and give a natural geometric interpretation of a quantity appeared in the W -entropy formula. Then we prove the W -entropy formula for the Witten Laplacian on compact Riemannian manifolds with time dependent metrics and potentials, and derive the W -entropy formula for the backward heat equation associated with the Witten Laplacian on compact Riemannian manifolds equipped… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main results, Theorem 1.7 and Theorem 1.9, combine and extend two previous-hitherto unrelated-lines of developments: results in the setting of smooth families of time-dependent Riemannian manifolds that characterize solutions to Ric C 1 2 @ t g t 0 on I M (super-Ricci flows), e.g., by means of the monotonicity property (II) in terms of the L 2 -Wasserstein metric for the dual heat flow, initiated by work by Mc-Cann and Topping [39]; for subsequent work in this direction that also includes equivalences with gradient estimates (III) and coupling properties of backward Brownian motions; see, e.g., Topping [53], Philipowski-Kuwada [32,33], Arnaudon-Coulibaly-Thalmaier [9], Lakzian-Munn [34], Li-Li [35]. results for (static) metric measure spaces by Ambrosio-Gigli-Savare [6] as well as by Erbar-Kuwada-Sturm [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main results, Theorem 1.7 and Theorem 1.9, combine and extend two previous-hitherto unrelated-lines of developments: results in the setting of smooth families of time-dependent Riemannian manifolds that characterize solutions to Ric C 1 2 @ t g t 0 on I M (super-Ricci flows), e.g., by means of the monotonicity property (II) in terms of the L 2 -Wasserstein metric for the dual heat flow, initiated by work by Mc-Cann and Topping [39]; for subsequent work in this direction that also includes equivalences with gradient estimates (III) and coupling properties of backward Brownian motions; see, e.g., Topping [53], Philipowski-Kuwada [32,33], Arnaudon-Coulibaly-Thalmaier [9], Lakzian-Munn [34], Li-Li [35]. results for (static) metric measure spaces by Ambrosio-Gigli-Savare [6] as well as by Erbar-Kuwada-Sturm [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of CD(K, m)-condition Theorem 2.1 can be viewed as the W -entropy formula for the heat equation of the Witten Laplacian on complete Riemannian manicolds with the CD(0, m)-condition. It is natural to raise the question whether we can extend Theorem 2.1 to the heat equation of the Witten Laplacian on complete Riemannian manifolds with the CD(K, m)-condition for general K ∈ R and m ∈ [n, ∞].In[26], we extended Theorem 2.1 to the Witten Laplacian on complete Riemannian manifolds with the CD(K, m)-condition for K ∈ R and m ∈ [n, ∞).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26,27]) Under the same notation as in Theorem 3.1, defineH m,K (u, t) = − M u log udµ − m 2 (1 + log(4πt)) − m Kt…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From [22,20,18,10,12,13], it has been known that there is a close connection between the differential Harnack inequality and the W -entropy for the heat equation on Riemannian manifolds. To see this link, let (M, g) be a complete Riemannian manifold with bounded geometry condition, u be a positive solution to the heat equation ∂ t u = ∆u.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [1], we say that (M, g, µ) satisfies the curvature-dimension CD(K, m)-condition 1 for a constant K ∈ R and m ∈ [n, ∞] if and only if See also our previous paper [13] and [14,15,16]. When φ is a constant and m = n, the (K, n)- (…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%