1998
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ICRP age-specific biokinetic model for lead: validations, empirical comparisons, and explorations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of how the bone mineral bioapatite-a calcium phosphate-takes up and releases these elements has launched a lively debate among numerous research groups. Health physicists have long debated in vivo remodeling (biologically controlled resorption and reprecipitation of bioapatite) vs. volume diffusion for explaining the slowest rates of uptake and release (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8); such research is commonly termed biokinetics. Geochemists debate in vitro recrystallization and surface adsorption vs. diffusion for explaining trace element profiles in fossils, although diffusive processes are normally assumed (9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of how the bone mineral bioapatite-a calcium phosphate-takes up and releases these elements has launched a lively debate among numerous research groups. Health physicists have long debated in vivo remodeling (biologically controlled resorption and reprecipitation of bioapatite) vs. volume diffusion for explaining the slowest rates of uptake and release (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8); such research is commonly termed biokinetics. Geochemists debate in vitro recrystallization and surface adsorption vs. diffusion for explaining trace element profiles in fossils, although diffusive processes are normally assumed (9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparisons made between the ICRP and IEUBK models have shown that the ICRP model tends to predict higher quasi -steady state blood lead concentrations than the IEUBK model for the same rates of lead absorption ( Pounds and Leggett, 1998 ). Thus, predicted blood lead concentrations and corresponding risk estimates (e.g., P 10 ) for long -term exposures that are based on the ICRP model can be expected to be higher than those based on the IEUBK model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential impacts of air lead exposures at the RSR site on blood lead concentrations in young children were assessed using the EPA IEUBK model ( v.99d) and the International Commission of Radiologic Protection ( ICRP ) lead model (Leggett, 1993;Pounds and Leggett, 1998). Although there are many differences between the two models, one difference particularly relevant to this analysis is the exposure time step ( the shortest time interval over which the exposure can be varied in a simulation ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was presented and discussed at the workshop at which this paper was also presented (28). The Leggett/ICRP model is an expansion of an ICRP age-specific model of lead metabolism (17,18 [year]-dependent intake rates and applies an age-dependent fractional absorption to them), the forms of the two curves for uptake of lead from food and water cannot be made congruent (Figure 14) Figure 15).…”
Section: Comparison With the Leggett/icrp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%