2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/109583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Identification and Differentiation between Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei Using One Gene Pyrosequencing

Abstract: The etiologic agents for melioidosis and glanders, Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei respectively, are genetically similar making identification and differentiation from other Burkholderia species and each other challenging. We used pyrosequencing to determine the presence or absence of an insertion sequence IS407A within the flagellin P (fliP) gene and to exploit the difference in orientation of this gene in the two species. Oligonucleotide primers were designed to selectively target the IS407… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular methods viz. randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), MLST, BurkDiff, pulse‐field gel electrophoresis, multiple locus variable number of tandem repeats, MLVA and one gene pyrosequencing have also been developed for identification and differentiation of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei (Antonov et al., ; Bowers et al., ; Chantratita et al., ; Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, ; Scholz et al., ). Polymerase chain reaction and other molecular assays are laboratory based, time consuming, labour intensive and require complicated instrumentation and technical expertise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular methods viz. randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), MLST, BurkDiff, pulse‐field gel electrophoresis, multiple locus variable number of tandem repeats, MLVA and one gene pyrosequencing have also been developed for identification and differentiation of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei (Antonov et al., ; Bowers et al., ; Chantratita et al., ; Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, ; Scholz et al., ). Polymerase chain reaction and other molecular assays are laboratory based, time consuming, labour intensive and require complicated instrumentation and technical expertise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fliP-IS407A genomic region has earlier been used for the development of PCR and real-time PCR assays for direct and specific detection of B. mallei Tomaso et al, 2006). Polymerase chain reaction-based assays reported prior to the year 2006 provided indirect proof of B. mallei detection based on the absence of B. pseudomallei-specific DNA sequences in B. mallei (Lee, Wang, & Yap, 2005;Thibault, Valade, & Vidal, 2004 pseudomallei (Antonov et al, 2007;Bowers et al, 2010;Chantratita et al, 2006;Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, 2014;Scholz et al, 2014 (Mirzai, Safi, Mossavari, Afshar, & Bolourchian, 2016;Pal et al, 2018). One LAMP assay has limitation regarding specificity (Mirzai et al, 2016) and the other has a detection limit of 1 pg genomic DNA of B. mallei (Pal et al, 2018).…”
Section: B Malleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In year 2006, A PCR assay and a 5ʹ nuclease real‐time PCR test targeting flagellar biosynthesis protein‐insertion sequence ( fliP‐ IS 407 A) were reported for specific and direct identification of B. mallei (Scholz et al., ; Tomaso et al., ). Other molecular methods for identification and differentiation of B. mallei from B. pseudomallei include pulse‐field gel electrophoresis, 16S rRNA sequencing, MLVA, PCR‐restriction fragment length polymorphism, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), MLST, BurkDiff and one gene pyrosequencing (Antonov et al., , ; Bowers et al., ; Chantratita et al., ; Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, ; Harvey & Minter, ; Scholz et al., ; Tanpiboonsak, Paemanee, Bunyarataphan, & Tungpradabkul, ). The described molecular methods are expensive, time‐consuming and labour intensive and require technical expertise, making them non‐viable for many laboratories with resource‐poor settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namun berdasarkan literatur, diketahui bahwa mutasi frame-shift pada yang dikode oleh gen motB milik B. mallei dapat digunakan sebagai primer duplex PCR. (15,16)…”
Section: Burkholderia Sebagai Patogen Infeksi Pada Manusia Burkholderia Pseudomallei (B Pseudomallei)unclassified