2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04882-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The identification and semi-quantitative assessment of gastrointestinal nematodes in faecal samples using multiplex real-time PCR assays

Abstract: Background The diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections in ruminants is routinely based on morphological/morphometric analysis of parasite specimens recovered by coprological methods, followed by larval culture (LC) techniques. Such an approach is laborious, time-consuming, requires a skilled expert, and moreover suffers from certain limitations. Molecular tools are able to overcome the majority of these issues, providing accurate identification of nematode species and, therefore… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High Isospora fecundity associated with most coccidia species (Burrell et al, 2020 ) may be responsible for a lower percentage of false negatives in captive samples, as oocysts will be shed in frequent and regular intervals in spite of unique shedding peaks. In studies where precise detection of a specific parasite is crucial, molecular‐based techniques may be more sensitive at detecting and quantifying parasites, especially with low infection loads (Dacal et al, 2018 ; Reslova et al, 2021 ). For either approach—molecular or microscopic—at least some individuals should be sampled repeatedly to provide an estimate of the error rate (which should then be reported).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High Isospora fecundity associated with most coccidia species (Burrell et al, 2020 ) may be responsible for a lower percentage of false negatives in captive samples, as oocysts will be shed in frequent and regular intervals in spite of unique shedding peaks. In studies where precise detection of a specific parasite is crucial, molecular‐based techniques may be more sensitive at detecting and quantifying parasites, especially with low infection loads (Dacal et al, 2018 ; Reslova et al, 2021 ). For either approach—molecular or microscopic—at least some individuals should be sampled repeatedly to provide an estimate of the error rate (which should then be reported).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that no GIN taxa were detected solely by parasitological methods and not concurrently by metabarcoding, we instead argue that metabarcoding of GIN DNA isolated from frozen faecal samples has increased sensitivity when compared with egg and larval counts from the same samples when they are fresh, most likely in cases with low egg and larval abundance. Other PCR-based methods have been demonstrated to have increased sensitivity over traditional microscopy-based methods for GIN detection [ 50 53 ], but to our knowledge, this has not been previously demonstrated for DNA metabarcoding. We hypothesize that this increased sensitivity can be attributed to the metabarcoding method also detecting extracellular DNA derived from adult worms [ 54 ] in the gastrointestinal tract that may be shedding few or no eggs at the time of sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, the Parelaphostrongylus genus includes at least three species identi ed as caribou parasites (P. odocoilei, P. tenuis, and P. andersoni) but their frequency of occurrence and impact on caribou health is quite different: P. andersoni, a muscle worm infecting caribou and other Cervidae in Canada, is common in boreal caribou, whereas P. tenuis, the meningeal worm, is rare but lethal 25 . Other complementary approaches, such as the sequencing of the ITS2 region using primers speci cally designed to target nematodes 33 or the use of qPCR detection assays allowing to differentiate species, as proposed for other nematodes (see Reslova 74 et al as an example), could be considered in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%