2017
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The identification of fungi collected from the ceca of commercial poultry

Abstract: Under normal conditions, fungi are ignored unless a disease/syndrome clinical signs are reported. The scientific communities are largely unaware of the roles fungi play in normal production parameters. Numerous preharvest interventions have demonstrated that beneficial bacteria can play a role in improving productions parameters; however, most researchers have ignored the impact that fungi may have on production. The goal of the present study was to record fungi recovered from commercial broiler and layer hous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
14
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their role in cecal microbiology is not clear. As with the data of Byrd et al [31], it seems probable that most are unlikely to grow under the anaerobic conditions in the cecum and arrived there after ingestion as dormant spores, which are able to withstand the hostile anaerobic and low pH conditions encountered within the cecum. Consequently, these data raise several interesting questions, including whether any of the fungi found there are strict anaerobes and whether they exist within the cecum as actively growing hyphae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their role in cecal microbiology is not clear. As with the data of Byrd et al [31], it seems probable that most are unlikely to grow under the anaerobic conditions in the cecum and arrived there after ingestion as dormant spores, which are able to withstand the hostile anaerobic and low pH conditions encountered within the cecum. Consequently, these data raise several interesting questions, including whether any of the fungi found there are strict anaerobes and whether they exist within the cecum as actively growing hyphae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…What role these fungi might play there is poorly understood, as similar published data are scarce. Byrd et al [31] using culture-dependent methods, managed to identify a large number of fungi in the cecum of broilers using rep-PCR. However, their culture method was not carried out under the anaerobic conditions found in the cecum, and most identified fungi appeared to be common highly sporulating airborne fungi, whereas some could not be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides Candida, Trichosporon, Geotrichum, Rhodotorula, and Saccharomyces have been reported in chickens as well (21)(22)(23). However, one other culture-dependent study reported the identification of 88 fungal species from over 3,000 cecal samples of broiler and layer chickens, with Aspergillus, Penicillium, Verticillium, and Sporidiobolus being the top four genera (25), whereas a cultureindependent 454 pyrosequencing method only revealed two fungal species, Cladosporium sp. and Cladosporium sphaerospermum, in the cecum of broilers fed unmedicated diets (20), presumably due to a lack of sequencing depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In limited poultry mycobiome studies, all but one were culture based, and most were restricted only to the cecum (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Candida or Aspergillus was revealed to be predominant in the chicken cecum in culture-dependent studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar supplementation at 800 mg/d also significantly increased the abundance of two OTUs classified as Vishniacozyma victoriae (5.4 × 10 7 -fold increase, phylum Ascomycota) and Sporobolomyces ruberrimus (5.4 × 10 7 -fold increase). V. victoriae (also known as Cryptococcus victoriae ) and S. ruberrimus are both species of yeast; V. victoriae has been identified in cow’s milk (Delavenne et al, 2011) and meat processing plants (Nielsen et al, 2008) and S. ruberrimus in chicken ceca (Byrd et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%