2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Identification of Metal Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Adding the Reclassified Relative Solvent Accessibility

Abstract: Many proteins realize their special functions by binding with specific metal ion ligands during a cell's life cycle. The ability to correctly identify metal ion ligand-binding residues is valuable for the human health and the design of molecular drug. Precisely identifying these residues, however, remains challenging work. We have presented an improved computational approach for predicting the binding residues of 10 metal ion ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further improve the prediction accuracy, we optimized the four parameters (e.g., n.trees, interaction.depth, shrinkage, and n.minobsinnode) in the GBM algorithm. According to the reported literature ( Rawi et al, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2020 ), the parameter range was set as follows: n.trees in n{100,150,200,250,300,350,400,450,500}, interaction.depth in d{3,5,7,9}, shrinkage in r{0.01,0.1}, and n.minobsinnode in m{10,20,30,40,50}. The AUROC values were used as the evaluation indicator to obtain the optimal algorithm parameters by the grid search method.…”
Section: Calculation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to further improve the prediction accuracy, we optimized the four parameters (e.g., n.trees, interaction.depth, shrinkage, and n.minobsinnode) in the GBM algorithm. According to the reported literature ( Rawi et al, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2020 ), the parameter range was set as follows: n.trees in n{100,150,200,250,300,350,400,450,500}, interaction.depth in d{3,5,7,9}, shrinkage in r{0.01,0.1}, and n.minobsinnode in m{10,20,30,40,50}. The AUROC values were used as the evaluation indicator to obtain the optimal algorithm parameters by the grid search method.…”
Section: Calculation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an improved Boosting algorithm, GBM algorithm was proposed by Friedman (2001 ). It achieved excellent results in many data mining competitions and was widely used in many fields ( Feng and Li, 2017 ; Rawi et al, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2020 ). The advantage of the GBM is that it inherits the advantages of a single decision tree and discards its shortcomings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our survey, 12 out of 23 sequence-based and 6 out of 9 structure-based methods filter the candidate complexes using high resolution with ≤3 Å. Some methods [ 50 57 ] remove the sequences/chains whose lengths are less than 50 residues (or 45 residues [ 58 ]) since they might be potential segments or peptides. To build an unbiased dataset, it is necessary to remove homologous or redundant proteins.…”
Section: Methods Development Of Metal-binding Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Evolutionary Profile-Based Features . Recent studies [ 54 , 56 , 57 , 80 , 81 ] pointed out that functional or structural important residues tend to show higher evolutionary conservation. The conserved residues are usually involved in enzyme activity, ligand binding, or protein structural stability [ 82 ].…”
Section: Methods Development Of Metal-binding Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%