1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-60682-3_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Identification of Thresholds of Acceptability and Danger: The Biological Route

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If these ratios suggest that risk exceeds a level of concern, a risk refinement using higher tier approaches becomes necessary. A high level of conservatism is required to cover the extrapolation uncertainty in these initial point estimates (7), but it should be made clear that this is just a screening level approach, which can only be used to focus on the most important contaminants and emission sources. An HQ > 1 (or RCR > 1) does not necessarily indicate real risk, but that another more complex assessment must follow to reduce uncertainty to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these ratios suggest that risk exceeds a level of concern, a risk refinement using higher tier approaches becomes necessary. A high level of conservatism is required to cover the extrapolation uncertainty in these initial point estimates (7), but it should be made clear that this is just a screening level approach, which can only be used to focus on the most important contaminants and emission sources. An HQ > 1 (or RCR > 1) does not necessarily indicate real risk, but that another more complex assessment must follow to reduce uncertainty to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%