1965
DOI: 10.4039/ent97897-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Identity and Distribution of Species of Phytoseius Ribaga (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Canada,

Abstract: Mites of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga largely inhabit plants and are at least partly predacious, feeding on tetranychid, eriophyid, and other mites. They probably also feed on pollen, honeydew, and plant juices, as do other phytoseiids that have been studied (Chant 1959; Dosse 1961; McMurty and Scriven 1964). They are not usually found in soil or humus but occur on many kinds of low growing plants as well as coniferous and deciduous trees. They have been collected on all continents and from the arctic to the tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probable setal homologies were determined by examining and comparing the ontogenetic relationships of both the Phytoseiidae and the Ascidae. The immature stages of the genera Amblyseius Berlese, Typhlodromus, and Phytoseius Ribaga in the family Phytoseiidae were studied by Chant (1958) and the immature stages of the Ascidae were described by Lindquist and Evans (1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probable setal homologies were determined by examining and comparing the ontogenetic relationships of both the Phytoseiidae and the Ascidae. The immature stages of the genera Amblyseius Berlese, Typhlodromus, and Phytoseius Ribaga in the family Phytoseiidae were studied by Chant (1958) and the immature stages of the Ascidae were described by Lindquist and Evans (1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of determining setal homologies on the dorsal shield of the Phytoseiidae was approached first by considering the ontogenetic relationships in both the Phytoseiidae (Chant 1958) and the Ascidae (Lindquist and Evans 1965). Secondly, the shape and size of the dorsal shield of exemplars from seven genera of Phytoseiidae were standardized, thereby enabling a more accurate comparison of the setal positions on the shield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion: From literature, it appears that Phytoseius macropilis is a rather variable species. Characters, given by some authors as distinctive, show considerable variation (Nesbitt, 1951;Chant, 1958;Chant, 1965;Chant and Athias-Henriot, 1960;Karg, 1971), particularly the length and thickness of setae s4 and s6, the shape of the spermatheca, the number of pre-anal setae present on the ventrianal shield and the shape of the macroseta on tibia leg IV. Examination of specimens of this species also revealed a considerable variation.…”
Section: Diagnosis: P Macropilis Is Distinguished By (Major Charactementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably this is the reason why descriptions of the spermathecae in literature are so variable (see for example Chant and Athias-Henriot (1960), Fig. 20;Chant (1965), Fig. 8; Dosse (1958a), Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation