2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9508-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The IIP Examination: an Analysis of Group Performance 2009–2011

Abstract: This report summarizes the performance of the Imaging Informatics Professional (IIP) examination from 2009 to 2011 (six exam administrations). Results show that the IIP exam is a reliable measuring instrument that is functioning well to consistently classify candidates as passing or failing. An analysis of the section scores revealed that content in the Image Management, Systems Management, and Clinical Engineering sections of the exam were somewhat more difficult than the content in the other sections. The au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a more definitive indication of the presence of graphene, the phase lag of the cantilever vibration was examined, as demonstrated in Figure 2a. The phase lag is influenced by surface properties such as adhesion, friction, and viscoelasticity [18]. As shown in Figure 2a, there is a notable difference in the phase lag between the bare Au surface and the graphene-supported Au film, amounting to approximately 10 degrees.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a more definitive indication of the presence of graphene, the phase lag of the cantilever vibration was examined, as demonstrated in Figure 2a. The phase lag is influenced by surface properties such as adhesion, friction, and viscoelasticity [18]. As shown in Figure 2a, there is a notable difference in the phase lag between the bare Au surface and the graphene-supported Au film, amounting to approximately 10 degrees.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%